https://classic.7sage.com/lesson/quiz-on-logical-reasoning-question-stems-first-half/

Quiz #4

The economist's statements, if true, most strongly support which one of the following?

The right answer is Most Strongly Supported.

Isn't it Strengthen?

PT66.S2.Q20

(C) All actions that fulfill moral obligations are performed in order to fulfill moral obligations.

These two words, 'all' and 'in order to' are indicating sufficient.

Then which part is sufficient in this sentence?

Admin Note: https://classic.7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-66-section-2-question-20/

PT 63/ LR 7/ (C)

I fully understand why (B) is an answer, but I think (C) is also plausible.

The argument is talking about 'symptom' and (A), (B), (D) and (E) are about 'symptom'.

(C) is about 'host animal' not 'symptom'. Isn't it flawed?

When I see A->B structure in the stimulus,

The right answers should be

The wrong answers should be

And these are irrelevant (could be true) ?

#help

PT51 LG#2

Regarding rule #2,

/K and /L → J

I think the contrapositive of this should be,

= J-K and J-L

Why JY skipped 1) and 2)?

Did I miss something?

Admin Note: https://classic.7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-51-section-4-game-2/

I am going to take the LSAT this October and January, but I have one concern. The priority deadline of the school I want to apply for is until February 1st, and the results of the January test are likely to come out around February 7th. The school said that the January exam is also accepted, but is there a big disadvantage?

Regarding one of the core lessons, not all/ some not.

https://classic.7sage.com/lesson/advanced-negate-all-statements/?ss_completed_lesson=1055

I am still confused.

Why does some not cover 0-99? Why from 0?

Isn't it supposed to be 1-99?

From the example sentence,

Some cats are not pretentious.

It seems odd if it means, "0 cats are not pretentious"

Could you help me understand this?

Thanks.

Just out of curiosity, are there any disadvantages if I ask for a fee waiver?

I am really confused about the relationship between these three things.

Sufficient-->Necessary, Cause --> Effect, Before-->After

Is it okay to understand like this?

All are in same logic?

Without literacy there can be no general awareness of the injustice in a society.

How do I negate this sentence?

Should I negate 'without' as well?

(me: Without literacy there can be some general awareness of the injustice in a society.)

Hello, I had dropped out my first college, after getting 7 semesters, as I was not into my major, and then I entered another college with a different major and graduated. Should I register my first college record at CAS?

I'm confused, beacuse I attented that school more than 2 years. So I think I have to do, but I am afraid whether it has a bad effect on me. Should I just skip this?