Hi There! I am Idalia and 28 year old wife and mother of a 3 year old son. I recently graduated with my Master's Degree in Business Administration and I currently a Consultant for ADP, but formerly was a Business operations Manager at a Healthcare Law Firm. I want to use my expertise in the the organizational development field and relate it to helping those who are not educated in this realm achieve their organizational goals from a legal perspective.

My biggest concern with regards to my application is certainly my score. Therefore, having an impactful and well written statement is imperative to my application selection and approval.

I do have ideas in which I believe a great personal statement would make however, the receipt of the expert advice is always accepted.

1. The first idea I have about a personal statement is speaking about the reality of living as a minority and if "equal rights" are truly as equal as they should be and how my knowledge, past career will stabilize the playing field for all.

2. The second idea I have about a personal statement is speaking about how seeing a t-shirt that read "I will be the first woman President" when I was 7 years old shaped my career path and societal focus becoming an attorney and goals of being the FIRST woman & minority president.

No, I did not attend the last time.

I was just discussing this with my friend the other day. I tend to be a lingerer on questions and i second guess myself and waste time. So I am implementing a plan that you pick a number, let's say 21.. and you shoot to answer 21 questions. You must be willing to guess on 5-6 questions. This route will give you lee-way on what questions to go for and what questions to skip based on preference. JY has amazing advice on this website towards the end of his course. You should listen. Good Luck

down to join rejoice.jones

ha ha me too.. keep the fight alive though.. Positive thinking, hard work, and determination. You got this!

YES ME TOO LOL

YOU ARE AWESOME!

In your explanation.. you said Historians and not sources when explaining.. just thought I point out.. i believe the elimination process should be done to the sources and not the historians

First of all... THANK YOU for making 4-5 hours studying entertaining. Secondly... let's say I knew nothing of conditional reasoning and I was starting the Syllabus as is.. I think your explanation would be incoherent to a novice LSAT studyer (not really a word though lol)... just a thought... but thank you for your wit and amazing explanations

Remember that rats are animals, so whether the answer choice distinguished that it was not a domestic animal, does not exclude that fact that rats are indeed animals.

Ok so what I need to comprehend and grasp.. even though certain answer choices may sound like the right answer choice. I need to ask myself- is this information (in any way supported) by the stimulus

Awesome breakdown....

i Agree. Also the word Least can be interchangeable with Except. So the question is really asking: All of the following is most supported by the stimulus, EXCEPT.. or something like that lol

I also thought that the strong language used in answer C did not match the conclusion, provided that the conclusion was the sentence following the premise after 'But'

In some of these responses, I think expressing that the scope of the argument is important when choosing a correct answer choice. Main Point/ Must Be True/ MSS questions are grounded in the fact that they are using the stimulus (considered as true) to pick an answer choice. Meaning that the Answer choices are under suspicion, and any information in the answer choices that are outside the scope of the stimulus/argument will be incorrect.

conclusion- indicator method?... this method is taught in the Powerscore Bible.. correct?

I picked D as well for that exact reason. I do not feel that the answer choice, if based on Main Point Criteria, could be 'without a doubt' chosen... eh