We don't know that she is a reasonable person.

However, it's reasonable to assume that she is, unless the stimulus explicitly says otherwise.

The assumption for AC A is not that just "more honking = more pressure", the assumption is that another vehicle in general adds more pressure.

With your point, you are right. Both make the same assumption and only explain 1 part of the support, but your assumption is misguided.

Did you mean to say that you made a spreadsheet of all the rules? If so, do you mind sharing a link to that?

The point of this section is to tell you that you WILL see these flaws on the test, and you need to be able to recognize them.

The valid forms of all of these arguments have already been taught to us in previous lessons.

If the argument was ONLY Jedi use the force, then yes the argument would be valid. Just because All Jedi use the force doesn't mean all force-users are Jedi.

All birds eat corn. Rob eats corn. Therefore, Rob is a bird.

This is invalid because Rob could be a human, a dog, a raccoon, anything.