@atticusbinch00884 Seems like everyone above who had that kind of section had it last, so they wouldn't know until the end
Is this for June LSAT?
How many sections do yall recommend taking for the PTs? Seems like there's an option to simulate the modern LSAT with the 3 scored sections which (correct me if I'm wrong) might give a more accurate score estimate. However, it might be better to simulate all 4 sections for stamina building and mimicking actual test day. So... what do yall think?
@7sage staff is there an option to take all four sections but have only 3 sections count towards the score?
too many switcheroos in this stimulus which is what got me confused and thought the argument was contradicting itself when it actually wasn't. "Some say this... but this... but that, so therefore wrong". UGHHHHHjksljflksd.
Just gotta watch out for the switch in language from "best" to "no/only." Can't make that change saying something is the best way to definitive only way language.
I made a general LSAT discord link if anyone wants to join
https://discord.gg/gNHK93Nn
Hi Everyone, I created a general LSAT discord if anyone is interested in joining.
Interested in joining as well!
I'm working through the CC right now and my preferred method is working through every other problem set (ex: problem sets 1-10, I would do 1,3,5,7,9). Since the problem sets difficulty increases, doing every other problem set allows you to get some practice with all difficulty levels and also saves problem sets with all difficulty levels for later practice.
And for any problem set that are not completed, I "star" the problem set to indicate those are the ones I can go back to for extra practice.
@gabeshelton3715 said:
@s00anderson268 said:
Let's look at the original statement first: "Only cats meow." Do Dogs meow? No. Do cows meow? No. Only cats meow.
Ok, so then we know if an animal is meows, it must be a cat. Hence, the translation rule:
M --> C (If meow, then cat).
Now looking at C --> M (if cat, then meow), we can't infer this from the statement "Only cats meow." For all we know, our particular cat could bark. Just because you are a cat, that doesn't mean you meow. We just know from our statement that Only cats meow, not dogs, not cows, only cats.
I hope that clarifies some confusion!
Was going to respond too, but this is a great explanation!
Thanks! Feel free to add on as well!
Don't make assumptions because they make an ASS out of U and Me 🤡
Let's look at the original statement first: "Only cats meow." Do Dogs meow? No. Do cows meow? No. Only cats meow.
Ok, so then we know if an animal meows, it must be a cat. Hence, the translation rule:
M --> C (If meow, then cat).
Now looking at C --> M (if cat, then meow), we can't infer this from the statement "Only cats meow." For all we know, our particular cat could bark. Just because you are a cat, that doesn't mean you meow. We just know from our statement that Only cats meow, not dogs, not cows, only cats.
I hope that clarifies some confusion!
thank you for this explanation about D <3 I was having trouble understanding why it didn't work