- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
Admissions profile
Discussions
E doesn't make any sense. Even if a SINGLE long vacation reduces exhaustion much more than a SINGLE short vacation - the manager is suggesting MULTIPLE short vacations which may add up to a greater OVERALL reduction when summed..
#help #feedback
All we know about the case in the question stem is that an important question for that case is whether the handicraft in question can be described as "traditional".
In 1991, the court decided that the items made with sea otter pelts may be defined as "traditional" despite previous, narrow "definitions" of traditional requiring that a traditional handicraft is a continuously and commonly practiced handicraft.
The court in 1991 acknowledged that continuously practicing that handicraft was impossible from 1910-1972 because of the law of the land prohibiting that practice.
In doing so, they established that the continuity of the practice is not a necessary factor in all cases, and that in some cases--such as the one in answer C-- this requirement can be ignored because the practice WOULD still be taking place were it not for external factors outside of the control of these indigenous peoples.
Passage B's statement that they grow unhappy with their illogical and unethical stance led me to 3 wrong answers..
I selected E. I thought "explanations" was too vague and ignored the psychological experiments and research conducted, especially when considering how many experiments were covered in the passage.. but if every answer is flawed then choosing one that leaves things out but has no flaws is clearly the necessary thing to do. Very tricky.
Not exactly. A is correct because the subscriber ASSERTS that the claim being made MUST be false, simply because the reasoning for that claim is flawed (in this case, we accept that the argument has flawed reasoning because it actually doesn't matter). The reason it doesn't matter is because disproving a premise to a conclusion doesn't mean that the conclusion must be false.
Nevermind