Since the correct answer was not as comprehensive here, it seems important to note that the question stem asks about which answer choice "most accurately expresses the main point" rather than "most accurately and completely summarizes the passage".
I quickly determined E to be wrong because the word 'vindicated' felt too strong. Was this valid quick reasoning here, or does the use of that word not impact the answer being wrong?
I’m starting to think the whole “low-res” technique is kind of bullshit. I wouldn’t have thought to put the distinction between “actual trials” and experiments simulating trials into a low-res summary. And frankly I don’t think the guy explaining this passage to us did that either. Honestly at this point it just seems more viable for me to use retention & looking back at the text.
Thank you so much for teaching 'low-res summaries.' They have helped so much in picking the right answer but also understanding why the wrong answers are wrong. :'')
Correct and 10 sec under target! I'll take the win noting that listening to the previous lessons that go over the low res & summary for this passage thoroughly set me up for success.
My assignment- become as thorough with low res, summary, and predicting MP as Kevin in about 2.5 minutes. No biggie.
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Hold on there, you need to slow down.
We love that you want post in our discussion forum! Just come back in a bit to post again!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.
59 comments
A totally got me, and then as soon as I hit submit I realized that the "actual trials" made it a trap, smh.
Should have went with my gut, C felt right but chose A instead...
yeouch
be so for real...
Since the correct answer was not as comprehensive here, it seems important to note that the question stem asks about which answer choice "most accurately expresses the main point" rather than "most accurately and completely summarizes the passage".
ez
so in lsat terms, i should treat vindicate as definitively proving something?
The word "held" in the right answer was throwing me off.
got it right and 34 seconds under time im so cracked
i be so happy when i get 1 question correct lol
I quickly determined E to be wrong because the word 'vindicated' felt too strong. Was this valid quick reasoning here, or does the use of that word not impact the answer being wrong?
chat I think RC is my stronger suit compared to LR
AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
The LSAC can suck my ass and balls for this question. Probably the most difficult main point question I have ever encountered in 6 months of studying.
I’m starting to think the whole “low-res” technique is kind of bullshit. I wouldn’t have thought to put the distinction between “actual trials” and experiments simulating trials into a low-res summary. And frankly I don’t think the guy explaining this passage to us did that either. Honestly at this point it just seems more viable for me to use retention & looking back at the text.
like what the hell are you talking about
BOOM
the technique worked like soft butter being spread over freshly toasted bread.
nonsense
Finally got one of these level 5 RC questions right!
Had it right and then changed it to E. in blind review. Confidence comes from practice, just need to trust my gut.
Thank you so much for teaching 'low-res summaries.' They have helped so much in picking the right answer but also understanding why the wrong answers are wrong. :'')
I chose A. I questioned the 'legal scholars' part but I figured a lawyer could maybe be characterized as such, so I stuck with it.
Correct and 10 sec under target! I'll take the win noting that listening to the previous lessons that go over the low res & summary for this passage thoroughly set me up for success.
My assignment- become as thorough with low res, summary, and predicting MP as Kevin in about 2.5 minutes. No biggie.
I picked E. 😑 I have to read more carefully!