While I appreciate your concern for my health, Ohno, you mis-inferred the point of my post. Colloquially, a reach school is something we hope for, but don't necessarily expect admission to.

Note that I did not solicit advice on how to get in to WUSTL. I'm starting a conversation with other applicants who hope for, but don't necessarily expect admission to WUSTL.

Badass! Can I ask time elapsed between 157 -170 and study habits/approach?

I'm 32. I understand the pressure to go straight to school but the year you'll spend to improve your LSAT will be worth $ - it's not a wasted year. Furthermore, it'll give you an opportunity to take up a sport, hobby, volunteer, or find work that will help you improve yourself and therefore your application. Don't give it any more thought. The people in your life will appreciate the wisdom and patience in your decision. Good luck. :)

@ said:

Yes, link conditionals where possible. Also, however, remember that these rules are separate, and are sometimes better understood as such. I hope that makes sense.

Yes, it does. Thank you and everyone else for your responses.

Go for it. If you don't get what you're aiming for then you'll have a much better idea of what you need to do to get there.

> @ said:

> I have exhaustive 'checklists' for LR and LG. They're much more streamlined and convenient than this. I'm still working on a definitive RC approach but I have something more definitive than what's on the flowchart above.

>

> I could help out.

I'd love to see these.

@ said:

I draw a three item sequence and circle it. After practice you get used to distinguishing this from a three item block. It's just a quicker notating method after a while.

Do you also draw out "master" sequencing chains by tying these chains to the other rules or proceed directly to the questions?

@ said:

@ said:

@ said:

..."but not both" sequencing games. I've been practicing these after the Dec LSAT. I thought I had a good handle on them but I took way too long to diagram my possible worlds game 2 (I realized I made a mistake halfway through the question set and had to redo them).

I'm currently doing drills in Powescore's LG workbook.

What exactly are "but not both" sequencing games? I'm not too familiar with the Powerscore nomenclature.

Not sure this is Powerscore terminology. As far as I'm aware, Powerscore does not distinguish games in this way.

OP is more likely wondering how to efficiently represent the 'but not both' rules often found in sequencing games.

Precisely.

I'm interested as well.

@ said:

I had 18 mins for the apartments game and I was still confused by a rule LMAO. aren't I the worst

That's crazy! Did you end up figuring it out?

@ said:

Does anyone remember one with echolocation and wales? Was that real or experimental?

I had 3 LR sections and don't remember that. Gotta be experimental

@ said:

I don't remember that question on mine and I had 3 LR.

X2.

@ said:

I'm still confused on what the real RC was

Copyrighting, beetle larvae & beavers, African American author, lying and democracy

@ said:

@ was your last game one about quilts/rugs at a fair? (Or maybe I’m just making up the part at the fair lol)

My last game was students and economics classes aka prerequisites

@ said:

@ you got trucks and runner, nurse, yoga for LG?

None of those ring a bell.

mine was LR LG LR LR RC. I can confirm the above for real LG and RC. 2nd LR?: pollution from diesel boats contributing to acid rain and global warming, 3LR: wines from certain soil are something and age well 10 years. I had the oil prices re inflation and flat rate surcharge vs percentage here too. Blanking on the first LR.

I'd probably do J/O* to remind me that O in is N in

Thank you, guys.

@ said:

Did anybody else have as much trouble with the apartment game as I did? I felt like the other three were fine (which now I’m anxious was because I somehome completely missed something) but the apartment game threw me off so badly! I had no idea how to solve it

Is this game at all like anything else anyone has seen? Was this one of those rare 15 minute games or were there some game changing inferences? I only had about 5 minutes to dedicate to this.

@ said:

@ said:

@ said:

@ said:

@ said:

had three LRs, i remember one was hard... it had 26 questions and a question about an ancient greek charachter reading a tablet that asked to reject one of the statements? Was that experimental?

Some PLEASE tell us this was experimental?

I had the same thing. Please let me know if you find out if the tablet one is the experimental

I think it was the experimental. My experimental section was RC and I'm sure I did not have this question in either of my LR sections

I had only 2 LR sections...and I did see the greek tablet question in one of my LR's.

Ditto.

Hey Alex, I'd like to join.

Thanks!

I've read this quote before but not attributed to Calvin Coolidge. Looked it up and sure enough it has other origins: https://quoteinvestigator.com/2016/01/12/persist/#more-12797