As it is disclosed to the Sept. test takers, would anyone be interested in BRing the September 2016 LSAT with me this week?
- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
Admissions profile
Discussions
I agree with @rileymajeunefagan676. Burnout may certainly deter you from your optimal performance come Monday. It's a rookie mistake, you are a better than that. Your mind is telling you to stop, it's fatigued. I should probably heed to my own advice but ohh well. Yeah, just chill!
To keep it simple, the biconditional requires A or B to be in, but not both. The not both rule could have both out. You can think of it in terms of max out
Employing @mahdirasouli9688's method, I usually did four games or one full section each the weekday and one PT on the weekends. After a while, you'll start to draw inferences mentally as you are writing out the game rules. It's great! Be forewarned, you'll start to be a game addict after you foolproof. I'm currently drilling the remainder sets and that's the only thing I want to do the whole day. It's pretty sick but nonetheless it is imperative if you want to break into the 170 range.
It's just an inclusive or. If not A, then B = If not B, then A. At minimum one must be present.
The three major manufactures have an oligopoly. Their transition to smaller packages certainly doesn't dictate the actions of other smaller producers. So, how can we concede the virtual disappearance of old-style bulky detergents when we have other producers in the market? E certainly makes this more plausible. If there is a shift in consumer demand to conserve cardboard, it is more likely smaller producers will be forced to switch to smaller packaging or dissolve their business. This doesn't make the outcome certain but rather makes it more likely.
In A, you are assuming smaller manufactures dissolve their respective market share rather than remain competitive. Do we know that there isn't a demand for the bulky detergents allowing those manufactures to remain in the market ? The fact that manufacturing smaller detergents is too expensive does not equate to dissolving a business.
I hope this kind of helped!
@gregoryalexanderdevine723 lol "it's too expensive to get hurt in this country." I agree. either low premiums and high deductibles, or high premiums and low deductibles. "Apply for family care, get denied due to income ineligibility, take a week or two off of work or until your monthly net is below the monthly family care upper cap, ask your employer to remit a pay stub w/o the YTD, family care will reconsider and ultimately you'll lawfully be admitted. No premiums, no co-pays, just full coverage," said a friend. Not advocating, merely sharing.
I am available from 1pm to about 3:15PM on Sunday. Let me know what time slot works for you guys!
First off, I appreciate the advice and I plan to follow on it! To clarify I've taken all the PTs from 35-78 prior to the test day. However, none of them in one sitting but rather each of the sections being dispersed throughout the day. So if the question is have I taken a full length PT, the answer is no. Should I be working on time management or will that come naturally as I progress? Lastly, is there an ideal number of PTs i should be completing per week?
Thank you @jhaldy10325 and @ngir1293288 for confirming
A
Well for me at least, "more" is a relative term. We are drawing a comparison of price drawing more dependency from fashion or production materials. But do we actually know fashion draws "more" of an influence? Also, "any manufactured good" reaches way beyond the scope of argument. I hope this helps to clarify why E is the more viable choice.
Good luck guys! The hard part of studying long hours is already completed. Now, its time to reap the benefits of all our hard work.
C -> DT -> HSU
-------------------------------
CW
C: Confidential
DT: Delayed Treatment
HSU: Humans suffer unnecessarily
Answer choice "B" states that -HSU -> -C.
We already have that in the premise so I don't see how answer choice works. Please advise.
Hey, I purchased the Ultimate but I've received message stating that I need to purchase the Ultimate+ for Quick View access. Prior to this, I was able to view the silent videos. I'm hoping this is some sort of internal error and will be sorted out accordingly.
Does anyone recommend some light LR drilling before the test?