This is probably going to be pretty unhelpful but:

Practice your reading skills and familiarize yourself on the BASICS in a wide variety of topics (oil drilling, carbon dating, psychology, economics, art history, ancient civilizations, neuroscience, forestry, etc) so that you have a basic understanding of what's going on when you read an LR question

Read the stem first so you know exactly what to look for.

Most importantly, it's all about premise-conclusion and the assumption / "jump" that the author sneaks in when transitioning from P to C. You must identify P-C and think to yourself, okay, does this conclusion truly follow from this premise?

Don't think i'll be able to attend live - I will look forward to the podcast! Thank you!

From my experience, if you are an international test taker, your time slots will be severely limited to super early or around dinner time. If you are an NA test taker, then you pretty much have the entire (waking) day to choose from.

I've solved every logic game ever publicly released and I had the same games section as you (trucks, committees) and I also felt that the games section was REALLY easy. There was nothing tricky at all, extremely straightforward. The LR and the RC wasn't bad either, so it's probably going to be a hellish curve.

https://blog.powerscore.com/lsat/why-does-it-take-so-long-for-lsat-flex-scores-to-come-out/

I've taken the test 3 times - twice in South Korea and once in the US. I've never had any connection problems or any problems with ProctorU.

I've always used WiFi and my 2018 Macbook Air.

International Test! Took it this morning June 18th KST

RC felt like normal difficulty, like any standard 80s RC

1.Brittain’s Change from Pro war to Pacificist (moderate-easy)

2. Nunavut + Inuits and Government (moderate-easy)

3. Judicial Laws by Courts (difficult)

4. Carnivorous Starfish and Effect on Ecology (medium - difficult)

LG felt pretty easy.

Trucks + North/West/South

President/Secretary/Treasurer Committee Game.

LR felt okay, but not 100% sure if my intuitions are reliable. Nothing crazy.

It had a question about people's average raffle entry guesses, bird fossils found and about how they were likely to have been gliders, appreciating the use of poetry, 1800s houses and buildings in certain districts, governments promoting equality,

I don't remember much else about the LR as it was a blur but it felt easier than 85/86 LR.

Overall, unless it was one of those tests where you don't even realize you are getting DESTROYED, my version of the June test was straightforward and fair.

I know it's ironic / counter intuitive that I'm saying this here on 7sage forums but literally from here on out until the test, stay off all LSAT forums and social media. The negatives of anxiety and self doubt significantly outweigh any positives that you could gain from reading the posts.

I'm Korean and I eat Japanese Curry more often than I eat Korean Curry...

I felt like this one was attacking the conclusion almost

In the most, convoluted, stupidly verbose way possible, this question is saying:

Acne Causes Stress

Obesity Causes Stress

Therefore Obesity Causes Acne

86's LR has some really bullshit wording and bullshit questions, including this one.

I don't mind difficult questions at all, provided that they are fair.

But not like this. Why does LSAC have to deliberately fuck with us like this?

.

Yeah absolutely. In the LSAT world, people try to push the notion that outside knowledge has little impact on performance. However, I think that's straight up just false. Being well-read in multiple subjects (Art History, Economics, Philosophy, Psychology, Science, Fossils, etc.) gives you a HUGE advantage... you understand much more what's going on and what they are arguing and it's so much easier to visualize in your head the details and how things come together.

Are witnesses and suspects mutually exclusive?

your name is in caps tho

Got -0 for both sections of 81 but I got -5 for this one section alone...

The problem I had with 16 is that you have to assume they were the same society. I mean, the clay tokens became redundant over a period of hundreds of years, almost a thousand years.

Why should we assume that it was a continuous society?

B, C, and E are just garbage, which leaves us with A and D.

A is trying to get us to equate "official records" in the text with "strong central governmental authority"

But D is saying "THE society" which I interpreted as singular, "came to regard the tokens as redundant"

But what if earlier society A lived and died with the tokens and Society B was a transition society and Society C was purely a written society?

positive A moves with positive B.

negative A moves with negative B.

Therefore, A causes B.

It observes that things are correlated and then concludes a causal relation between the two things.

This question is basically socialism in a nut shell.

The millionaire's wages are distributed amongst everyone in the country.

Therefore, regionally speaking, everyone gains a little bit, but the millionaire's wages no longer "pull up" the average national wage, therefore the overall average wage goes down.

Nobody: When I grow up, I want to be a glass researcher!

I'm assuming you copy and pasted the question and LSAC or 7sage took it down because of copyright issues?

Huh? Where's the question? lol

.

Brilliant, this is what I was looking for. I thought 19 C was glossed over way too fast. Thank you!