Confused as to why we did not chain the second rule, O---> P/ (PT36 S4 G1). Previously in PT 33 S4 game 2 there was a similar condition and we did put it in our chain. Did anyone else notice this? I know that any condition with an "and" gives us one option with both games pieces . Any condition with an "or" will give us at least one of the two game pieces. "or" and Both can give us three different outcomes. I just don't understand what are the rules for chaining "or" and "both" conditional statements. Additionally we had PT 23 S1 G2 where we had an in/out game. One of the conditional rules here was Mh +Li--->Oh. Im assuming we could not chain this condition because it was two dimensional ???? Someone please help #help #admin
- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
Will we have scratch paper for these questions?
I don't understand how D is correct. Nothing in the passage mentioned body fat?
lol I got this wrong because I forgot to read the question. I just assumed we were on MSS questions that all asked the same thing.
I chose C because answer choice d stated an increase in professional bands. The last sentence states an increase in "professional musicians". confused how C is not the answer???
Because of time reasons the inference made just didn't click for me. Looking back I was between answer choice A or B. This is what helped me answer this question
Reasoning between both: A introduces 'other companies' therefore introducing a group of possible outcomes that are not EXPLICITLY stated in the stimulus but so does B. B discusses 'three months before' a time frame that wasn't really discussed in stimulus there introducing a set of possible outcomes not EXPLICITLY stated.
WHY A is MBF over B?
A- because A states that the "monthly sales within Calistan decreased" we are already told in the stimulus that the monthly sales remained constant. Even without making the connection between the Marvel and the rest of the market (marvel automobile decreasing but sales remaining constant there assuming that the rest of the market must have increased in order to make up for Marvel's decrease) you could just pick up on that language and quickly choose A over B.
B- even though we know that Marvel's sales and market share increased that YEAR we were told that there was a decrease following the imposition. We don't know if that that decrease BEGAN following the imposition, it could have started prior.
what helped me understand that D was right
.
A/B- both are referring to a study that measured the frequency/power of recall under hypnosis. Although this was one of things mentioned in a recent experiment (which honestly is the only part that is still confusing but once you read the rest and take into consideration what actually resulted from the study its easier to cancel choices out.
C- "inevitably" the study measured one group who actually listened to music and the other who didn't. So technically we have a group who did recall true memories. Therefore the passage does not support this
D : this was tricky but the answer says that what people recall depends on "at least some extent on suggestion". It does not say that what they recall is true or false. it just states that what people recall under hypnosis depends on what was suggested. Which is true because both groups recalled what was suggested to them.
E: nothing on visual memory was stated.
I don't understand why the less than 92% was supported in answer B. Although the senegalese coins were not refined due to their 92% gold content, there is nothing in the passage that states that specific percentage was the threshold for being refined????