Confused as to why we did not chain the second rule, O---> P/ (PT36 S4 G1). Previously in PT 33 S4 game 2 there was a similar condition and we did put it in our chain. Did anyone else notice this? I know that any condition with an "and" gives us one option with both games pieces . Any condition with an "or" will give us at least one of the two game pieces. "or" and Both can give us three different outcomes. I just don't understand what are the rules for chaining "or" and "both" conditional statements. Additionally we had PT 23 S1 G2 where we had an in/out game. One of the conditional rules here was Mh +Li--->Oh. Im assuming we could not chain this condition because it was two dimensional ???? Someone please help #help #admin