@JacksonBartling in quite a similar boat with regards to PS and outcomes. Would be very interested in hearing this take.
@am164 I’ve been applying to a couple of schools in the T-14 and the rest are all within the T-40.
Do you happen to have a resource to check about each school? Or is it a manual research.
If I have a couple of LSATs on file, and I believe the new one I took was a significant dip, is it worth buying Score Preview? Like I have a pretty big trend increase to 160-high, but I think this January test went horribly. I can see myself going down from a 160-high to a 160 flat. Does buying the score preview and canceling it make sense? I only took the test in January because I felt I could do a 3-5 point jump and break into a mid 170s.
No AI detectors do a great job yet. They are mildly to terribly inaccurate. I wouldn't worry about this.
Unique should signal an "if and only if", hence two-way relationship.
So, diagramming as follows:
1- HSE -> Leave Mark
2- HSE -> Implement
3- All Others ( or /HSE) -> /Implement
Contra of 3: Implement -> HSE
Combine 1 and 3, tying in 2:
Implement <-> HSE -> LM
So C MUST be true. All the rest could be true or false or whatever.
@bubbletime2011 I ruled it out for two reasons. First, we don't know anything about the market structure in question, it could be an oligopoly for all we know, and maybe an oligopoly would be a better fit than either option. Second, D does not really limit it to one industry, rather talks in a general/broad sense for potentially multiple industries.
Is it better to go with a riskier, more passionate PS, or a PS that is a lot more grounded in personal experience. Both stop way short of sounding accusatory, but between two topics, which would be a better intro to adcoms.