User Avatar
sbaek116
Joined
Apr 2025
Subscription
Free
User Avatar
sbaek116
Sunday, Jun 08 2025

interested!!

0
User Avatar
sbaek116
Thursday, Jun 05 2025

MP: Bio of Chopin and her different eras

0
User Avatar
sbaek116
Thursday, Jan 09 2025

At least the pain will all be over in 2 hours in 7Sage standards. Roughly translating to 4 hours in reality, give or take :)

8
User Avatar
sbaek116
Thursday, Jan 09 2025

C: I hope I never meet an LSAT writer.

P: For if I do, then I will go to jail.

That is a conditional premise. Have we learned how to handle an argument in such instances? /s

6
User Avatar
sbaek116
Friday, Dec 20 2024

You can do it. Don't give up, just keep pushing.

16
User Avatar
sbaek116
Tuesday, Dec 03 2024

I will score 190.

38
User Avatar
sbaek116
Tuesday, Dec 03 2024

<3

1
User Avatar
sbaek116
Wednesday, Nov 27 2024

Kind of a late reply, but I think this is incorrect as the point of comparison is the 'retalitory force'. The first part of the sentence is just providing context, not directly giving a point of comparison.

What I've found helpful to do is simply put a bracket around the "kernel of the comparison" which would be "nation maintain a retaliatory force greater than that of any other nation", and then add on any other details like the context after first digesting the comparison information.

Hope this helps.

1

Confirm action

Are you sure?