User Avatar
sbaek116
Joined
Apr 2025
Subscription
Free

Admissions profile

LSAT
Not provided
CAS GPA
Not provided
1L START YEAR
Not provided

Discussions

User Avatar
sbaek116
Sunday, Jun 08 2025

interested!!

0
User Avatar
sbaek116
Thursday, Jun 05 2025

MP: Bio of Chopin and her different eras

0
User Avatar
sbaek116
Thursday, Jan 09 2025

At least the pain will all be over in 2 hours in 7Sage standards. Roughly translating to 4 hours in reality, give or take :)

8
User Avatar
sbaek116
Thursday, Jan 09 2025

C: I hope I never meet an LSAT writer.

P: For if I do, then I will go to jail.

That is a conditional premise. Have we learned how to handle an argument in such instances? /s

6
User Avatar
sbaek116
Friday, Dec 20 2024

You can do it. Don't give up, just keep pushing.

16
User Avatar
sbaek116
Tuesday, Dec 03 2024

I will score 190.

38
User Avatar
sbaek116
Tuesday, Dec 03 2024

<3

1
User Avatar
sbaek116
Wednesday, Nov 27 2024

Kind of a late reply, but I think this is incorrect as the point of comparison is the 'retalitory force'. The first part of the sentence is just providing context, not directly giving a point of comparison.

What I've found helpful to do is simply put a bracket around the "kernel of the comparison" which would be "nation maintain a retaliatory force greater than that of any other nation", and then add on any other details like the context after first digesting the comparison information.

Hope this helps.

1

Confirm action

Are you sure?