Honestly, I think you're overthinking WRT 7sage V1 and V2. Do the core curriculum, drills, PTs w/ Blind Review, and more drills. I never took the PT 7sage recommends prior to doing the CC but I took one as part of a different studying program, got like a 148, and recently I got a 162 and BR 166 after finishing the CC and just doing the problem sets and logic games drills. Mindset is everything; instead of thinking of all the study methods and ruminating over which is best, stick to 1 and genuinely try to learn (take a lot of notes and more notes on review vids for the questions you get wrong). Honestly, you also have more time than August if you really need it. First thing 7sage recommends is not to try and squeeze all studying into 3 months trying to get a 170. It gets harder and harder to get a higher score as your score improves due to the curve. Hope this helps, and stick with it!

Just leaving my thoughts in case it helps anyone:

I wrote the logic in basically the same way as JY, but I think the translation from English may be more intuitive; instead of thinking "lecturer + effective teacher," I just combined terms and sort of made the group we were talking about "lecturers" (in a way I also made the assumption that teachers=lecturers)

EF: effective

EC: eccentric

GC: good communicator

EF---m---> EC

/EC some EF

EF----->GC

From these premises, we can draw 2 conclusions:

1) GC some EC: some good communicators are eccentric lecturers

2) /EC some GC: some non-eccentric lecturers are good communicators

(1) is answer choice (A) and we can anticipate it #feedback

interested!