PT104.S4.Q3 > Question

SECTION 1 · lr

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26

SECTION 2 · rc

PASSAGE 1

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6

PASSAGE 2

Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14

PASSAGE 3

Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21

PASSAGE 4

Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26

SECTION 3 · rc

PASSAGE 1

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7

PASSAGE 2

Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14

PASSAGE 3

Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21

PASSAGE 4

Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26

SECTION 4 · lr

If citizens’ acting upon their desire is NOT a direct threat to the health/property of other citizens → a just government does NOT restrict the right of its citizens to act upon that desire

We’re looking for a judgment conforms to the principle. So we’re looking for a situation where citizens’ acting upon their desires is NOT a direct threat to the health/property of others, and hence a just government does NOT restrict the right of its citizens to act upon that desire. The correct answer might also involve a situation in which acting upon a desire does present a direct threat to health/property of others, and the government might be able to restrict in that case.

It’s reasonable to think unrestricted racing of sports cars on public highways directly threatens other people. So, it makes sense that the government might be able to restrict this. But merely owning a sports care doesn’t present a direct threat, so a just government wouldn’t ban the sale of sports cars.

The principle tells us what a just government does. But it doesn’t tell us what an unjust government does. We don’t know if an unjust government would abolish any activities based on the principle in the stimulus.

We know what a just government would not restrict. But (C) doesn’t concern what a just government would restrict. We don’t know to whom a just government would provide money.

We can’t conclude that a just government would censor magazines/movies that criticize the government, because we have no reason to think that such criticism presents a direct threat to other citizens.

The principle tells us what a just government does. But it doesn’t tell us what an unjust government does. We don’t know who an unjust government would incarcerate.

PrepTest 104 - Section 4 - Question 3

Difficulty

Analysis

Answer Popularity

Question history

Confirm action