What exactly is this foolproofing concept that everyone is talking about? I did another course but looking to get outside knowledge and different inputs.
- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
@ Yeah. I didn't know there was a group message
Definitely hadn't seen this video until this point so thank you!
What time are we doing this call? I'm in Toronto so EST for me
Wow! You are amazing. I've been using the memory method which has helped with accuracy but my timing is off so I'm trying to go faster without messing up too much. I'll take all this into consideration
I'd love to join....I'll do PT 74 on Thursday or Saturday!
I am absolutely terrible at RC. I can't finish all 4 passages and even without finishing all 4, I still get quite a lot of questions incorrect. Any RC tips? I'd appreciate any tips. I tried notations but I found that it slowed me down because I was spending too much time trying to figure out what was important enough to circle or put into brackets.
Well after the test today....I'm in. Please add me as well :)
Sorry to hear! I wrote at Humber North and it was very comfortable. You should do your rewrite there!
@ said:
I had experimental LR, RC with opera comparative passages was real and so was the LG section with the musicians accompanying performers
We had the same experimental then. I just don't know what section LR was the experimental. What was your 1st and 3rd section?
I'm not sure about this NAQ as a bridge statement but one BIG difference between NAQ and SAQ is that a NAQ must be true. If you negate that statement, your argument can no longer stand. A SAQ addresses your conclusion and makes the perfect argument so no holes can be poked into it if that answer choice is selected