No I mean that I took the June 2018 test, which was all handwritten and am satisfied with my writing sample. Then, I took the June 2019 test, which was all handwritten except for the writing sample, which could be done from home if we wanted to. I haven't done the second writing sample because I am satisfied with my first one, but I am wondering how it would look if I used my writing sample from a over a year ago with my test from a few months ago.
I took the June 2018 LSAT and although I wasn't happy with my score, I was happy with my writing sample which is handwritten. I took the June 2019 LSAT and am happy with my score, and am wondering whether it would look bad if I submitted my June 2019 LSAT with my June 2018 writing sample.
Thank you!
@cassandrahastie3892 said:
Did anyone else find the real RC to be particularly challenging?
Yes. It killed me!
Did anyone have the RC section with fisheries or movies and their intended audiences?
Not sure if anyone else had this thought, but I doubted E for a long time because the conclusion says that the "decision of these three manufacturers(...) will eventually bring about the virtual disappearance of old-style bulky detergents". Doesn't this mean that the decision will be the thing that brings about the disappearance, and if so, E seems to say that environmental concerns will bring about the increased purchase of concentrated detergent, AKA environmental concerns will be the causal factor, not the decision of the manufacturers.
I only chose E because every other choice seemed very wrong, but I am not 100% confident in the fact that E is right.
At first I was confused because I did not understand why the accuracy of the temperature was weakened by the fact that there exist different temperatures within the two plants (if I take the temperature at a height of 12 feet, that temperature can still be accurate, it might just be different from the temperature at 2 inches), but then I understood that it is weakened because it introduces a new piece of information. Instead of only forming a conclusion based on what the thermometer reads, we are told that the thermometer will read two different temperatures depending in what height it is tested; therefore the premiss (that the thermometer is accurate in so far as it reads 1 celsius and can only have an error of +/- 1 )is less supported because we know that the temperature changes and that the temperature could be -20 for one plant and 20 for another plant.
Thank you!