Yes, we are

Still needing a BR partner?

D is right because If a society has some crimes (1-99 crimes out of 100), then from the stimulus we can conclude that is has some laws (1-99 laws out of 100). If we have one crime, then we know there is at least 1 law that would make said action into a crime.

B is wrong because we can still have laws without crimes. It’s confusing sufficient w necessary

The stimulus says this:

Crimes ——> laws

With the contrapostive being

/laws —-> /crimes

Answer choice B is saying this:

/crimes —-> /laws

I'm interested in joining!

That's annoying, sorry you're having to deal with that. hopefully it all gets resolved pretty soon.

Interested for sure, not as much of a morning person but the time change works perfectly in my favor lol. I am currently pting in the high 160s, just hit 170 for the first time last week and my goal is also 170+

that's so weird. I submitted my request day before June registration closed and surprisingly they approved and emailed me the next day. Would definitely get in contact with them

Definitely interested!