Nope. I would think maybe in the next 15 minutes or so?

On what basis do law schools issue unsolicited fee wavers?

First post on the community here but I hope that helps:

The paradox here is that the car seats, if used, are supposed to reduce car injuries, but a large number of children who use the car seats are still subject to those injuries (that the car seats are supposed to prevent).

If you look closer, B does not say that children are using those car seats while riding. Instead, B makes a general claim about children riding cars. The stimulus is about children who use the car seats while riding, not children who ride in cars in general.

Hope it helps.