We have an exciting webinar coming up!

  • On December 11, from 9–10 p.m. ET, we'll host Polly Lawson, a 7Sage consultant and assistant dean for graduate studies at UVA Law. (Register.)
  • The webinars are free, but you’ll have to register in advance:

  • Polly Lawson of UVA Law.
  • We’ll ask our guests about their admissions processes and law school admissions in general. In the second half of the webinar, you'll get a chance to ask your questions directly.

    🍪One attendee of each webinar will get a free Edit Once.

    What questions would you like us to pose in the first half? What issues would you like us to bring up? Please make your suggestions in the comments.

    Past Webinars

    ~~On November 6, from 9–10 p.m. ET, we will host Sabrina Huffman and Anne Richard, the director of admissions and acting dean of enrollment management, respectively, of George Mason Law. Before coming to George Mason, Sabrina Huffman was an assistant director of admissions at USC Gould School of Law; Anne Richard was a dean of admissions at the University of Virginia School of Law.~~

    ~~On November 13, from 9–10 p.m. ET, we’ll host Mathiew Le, the assistant dean for admission and financial aid of The University of Texas at Austin School of Law.~~

    ~~On December 4, from 9–10 p.m. ET, we’ll host Matthew Dillard, the director of admissions of The George Washington University Law School, and Rob Schwartz, the assistant dean of admissions of UCLA Law. (Register.)~~

    8

    34 comments

    • Friday, Oct 18, 2019

      What are some common traits of applicants who "punch above their numbers"?

      7
    • Saturday, Oct 19, 2019

      What are the common types of situations where writing an addendum would hurt the applicant more than to not write one at all?

      6
    • Friday, Oct 18, 2019

      What are common mistakes or 'no-nos' on applications that are frequently seen that could easily be avoided?

      5
    • Wednesday, Dec 18, 2019

      Hi everyone + @jamilwilkerson737 ! The videos are up.

      Find Polly Lawson's webinar here:

      Find the webinar with Rob Schwartz and Matt Dillard here:

      4
    • Friday, Oct 18, 2019

      What are the cases/circumstances/themes/commonalities of admits below both medians who are not URM (ppl with not great numbers, some even with a number way below a median)? Outside of extraordinary circumstances (Olympian, Nobel prize winner, Purple Heart award, etc).

      4
    • Thursday, Nov 7, 2019

      @jenarmathews617 we're working on it. Stay tuned!

      2
    • Saturday, Nov 2, 2019

      For candidates who have lower-than-median LSAT or/and GPA figures, what would you find that makes you really want to admit that person - their special experiences, or some traits you found by reading the personal statement? Hope to get some examples, if possible. Thanks a lot for holding the webinars!

      2
    • Monday, Oct 28, 2019

      On what basis do law schools issue unsolicited fee wavers?

      2
    • Thursday, Dec 5, 2019

      @davidbusis895 Is UCLA allowing yesterdays webinar to be uploaded? If yes, when? Thank you!

      1
    • Thursday, Nov 7, 2019

      Hey all! Are these webinars recorded and made accessible for later viewing if we can't make it? Thank you!

      1
    • Thursday, Oct 31, 2019

      How advantageous is it for a student to send in their application very early ? In other words, is it better to have a better score in regular cycle or a relatively worse score in early cycle?

      1
    • Monday, Oct 21, 2019

      If you had to assign a percentage, how important is the story of the personal statement vs. the strength of the writing?

      Will a relatively mundane personal statement that is written strongly prevail over an interesting story with occasional sentence structure and grammar mistakes or vice versa?

      1
    • Saturday, Oct 19, 2019

      Funding options for nontraditional students with multiple degrees?

      1
    • Saturday, Oct 19, 2019

      Advice for a great C&F addendum?

      1
    • Wednesday, Dec 11, 2019

      @jamilwilkerson737 one of the schools said yes; still waiting on the other one. I'll let you know here when it goes up.

      0
    • Sunday, Dec 8, 2019

      Thoughts on writing admissions essays as a nontraditional student?

      0
    • Wednesday, Dec 4, 2019

      @davidbusis895 said:

      Webinar with Matt Dillard of the George Washington University Law School and Rob Schwartz of UCLA Law is starting soon!

      Good evening!

      It's my first webinar with 7sage. Are we automatically muted? Just want to make sure my background noises are not interfering with the meeting.

      0
    • Wednesday, Dec 4, 2019

      @luuppeter847 unfortunately, Texas Law has asked us not to post their webinars.

      0
    • Wednesday, Dec 4, 2019

      Webinar with Matt Dillard of the George Washington University Law School and Rob Schwartz of UCLA Law is starting soon!

      0
    • Wednesday, Dec 4, 2019

      WIll you upload the University of Texas webinar from last month? I was only able to listen in on parts of it.

      0
    • Tuesday, Dec 3, 2019

      For GW & UCLA- How heavily is one's undergraduate major weighed in the admissions process? My major was not directly related to law (or my interest in it) and I'm concerned it might seem inconsistent with the rest of my application. I did well and developed strong writing/research skills as a result but will my unconventional degree ultimately count as a strike against me?

      0
    • Thursday, Nov 14, 2019

      Congrats to @luuppeter847, the winner of our Edit Once giveaway!

      0
    • Wednesday, Nov 13, 2019

      @sidytraore580 said:

      On what basis do law schools issue unsolicited fee wavers?

      I have been wondering this too! Have you gotten a bunch of these emails also?

      0
    • Wednesday, Nov 13, 2019

      The webinar with Texas Law is starting soon!

      0
    • Monday, Nov 11, 2019

      @davidbusis895 For the U.T. Q&A: I feel like providing information to admissions offers is a delicate balance between "well-rounded" and "too much" whereby, in ones attempt to be as explanatory as possible, a conflict between brevity and addressing only the necessary/important parts of an application is created. In an attempt to be judicious with an applications supporting materials, what is deemed truly important in terms of explanation? (Gap in W.E., Multiple takes/multiple cancels LSAT, Low GPA, diversity statement, why X). To some degree I realize its case-by-case but are there triggers that suggest necessity in these statements? (e.g. 6 month gap in W.E. - Yes definitely explain, 2+ cancellations on LSAT - Yes def explain, etc.)

      0

    Confirm action

    Are you sure?