Personally it started like this for me too, since I like to read things in detail. What helped me was to try and understand the gist of the paragraph as you are reading it. For example, finishing reading a paragraph -> think what it's purpose was (ex. new arg, introduction, opposing previous arg, giving evidence etc.) -> move on to next paragraph. Try to keep it under 3-4 minutes. Additionally I would recommend reading an scientific or new article daily just to practice your comprehension skills. After reading, ask yourself, what was the main point? how did they argue for their stance if its an opinion piece? etc. Good luck!

am I the only one who interpreted ancient Greek play as a play in the genre of "ancient Greek"....? For example, a Civil War play is a play about the Civil War not a play during the Civil War?

@chapmankyle777 But, according to the definition of aberration, a departure from what is normal, usual, or expected, typically an unwelcome one, it implies that being mainstream, which refers to attitudes, ideas, and activities that are accepted as normal or conventional, is not aberration.

I think the reason why it is wrong is that while Richard claims that abstract art will eventually be seen as an aberration, Jung-Su claims that abstract art is part of the artistic mainstream, but never says anything about whether or not it will or will not be an aberration.

hope this helps

stimulus:

All x-> y, Most y ->z

C: most x->z

A)

All x-> y, Most x-> z

C: most y -> z (this is also wrong btw, ex. all cats are mammals, most cats are furry. so, most mammals are furry)

D)

Most y-> z, all x -> y

C: most x->z

@KeonaMason Questions marked for BR aren't necessarily marked because they are wrong, it could also be that you have spent some time on it or have flagged it.