- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
Hi,
The idea is "How can we weaken the conclusion that dinosaurs are warm-blooded"?
Based on the premises, if AC "B" is correct, our conclusion will fall apart considering the premises. I take my exam in a few days. I hope all goes well.
Hope this helps.
MSS questions typically seek answers that can be found or inferred from the stimulus. A is correct because the other ACs are not supported. I hope this helps.
Hi,
I see your point, but, don't overanalyze it. Ask yourself "Why does the author disagree with Costa?"
The correct answer will point out the flaw in the author's reasoning.
I guess what I'm trying to say is that the semantics of what is true of art, etc., are irrelevant because the author already made a big blunder in his conclusion.
Note: Always assume that the premises are true. Always attack the conclusion.
I hope this helps. Good luck!
Congrats, Ya'll!
Hi,
One method I use is that I remove the Predicate, i.e. Verb and object; If the sentence does not make sense, then that's the main verb. For example, in "helped archeologists discover tombs". If you removed "helped archeologists" the sentence falls apart. If you remove "discover tombs", it does not. I hope that helps.
I agree. Try changing the playback rate to 1.7 or higher. I have mine at 1.7.