Hi everyone. I have been studying for the lsat for more than 2 1/2 years now. My highest score was a 175 and I am usually scoring between 165-169. I took the April Lsat and scored a 159 :(. I don't know where to go from here now. Im really solid in LR and LG, but Reading Comp kills my score, consistently getting -7. Can anyone help me, or is anyone interested in being a study buddy?
- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
C is also incorrect because Indoor Seating in this restaurant was actually necessarily for it to be successful, not sufficient.
Same, taking my LSAT soon, took this one and got -7 on both sections, I haven't scored so low in long :(
Hi I would also be interested! Please email me at Siya.majmundar@gdeltorolove891.edu
Okay let's try to figure out why A is wrong. The argument gives us a few premises:
P1: People are starting to plant trees as part of an incentive that shows trees can absorb the carbon dioxide that would otherwise go in the atmosphere.
P2: Another study shows that trees absorb carbon dioxide less effectively than native grasses
Conclusion: Thus, the incentives of planting trees is hastening (or fastening) the process.
The key word here is fastening. What could possible be fastening the process. It's one thing for something to be ineffective in preventing a phenomenon. And, its another things for that same thing to be fastening the advent of that phenomenon.
When we look at AC A, it could be true. It could be true that trees also emit carbon dioxide, but is this fastening the process necessarily? What if native grasses also emit carbon dioxide. See? we don't know this. This choice would require many assumptions, thus rendering it incorrect.
Breaking down the stimulus: Here we know that “most” (generally) newspapers report on stories that sound dramatic. Then we are told that small studies are reported more frequently than large stories. Thus, we are told, that small stores must be more dramatic than large. Basic assumption here is that, the only reason why small stories are reported more frequently than large stories, is because they are more dramatic. Hence, there is no other reason why small stories are reported more frequently.
Yes please!! Im unable to message you too, could you please reach out to me at siya.majmundar @antonioszarkatzias363.edu? Thank you so so much!
Hello Rafiqzada! I would be intersted in joinin! Please feel free to DM me! Thank you and I look forward to hearing from you soon!
im interested too!!
Interested!