Ok so if I am deciphering all the lessons leading up to now correctly, I am left with: you cannot make any valid conclusions if you only have knowledge about the necessary term. Does this statement hold true?

#help This has been explained a couple of times, but I still cannot seem to wrap my brain around it. For the sentence, "Therefore, one cannot become Jedi unless one possesses extraordinary discipline.", I know I must follow the translation rule of group 3 because of the word "unless". However, I do not seem to be practicing the correct lawgic.

I keep doing: "If not become jedi, then possess extraordinary discipline" (negating the sufficient). I know this is incorrect but unsure why I am doing the lawgic incorrectly. Should I be saying "If not cannot become jedi, then possess extraordinary discipline"? Would really appreciate some help!

How does one know which is Set A and which is Set B?