To me it sounds like maybe issues identifying question types when they’re all mixed together? When you drill specific question types you know exactly how to go about each question before you even read the question stem, but in a normal section there’s naturally going to be a mix and you need to take time to read each question stem and understand what it’s asking. Maybe practice identifying question types and how to tackle them when you’re presented with them randomly? Even having flash cards with possible question stems and then determining what kind of question it is and how to tackle may be helpful!

I don't understand how Monique is not saying that good art criticism is always unbiased. She says criticism is only rendered by the best critics once biases have been shed, meaning good criticism is only unbiased. So wouldn't they both be agreeing that good art criticism has to be unbiased? To me it only seems like the point of disagreement is whether good criticism can be separated from emotion, which would've been answer C.