As if you were to try and add the second premise to the first you would not be able to find a link between T and BMR without flipping your second premise around for ‘D’ to end up in the middle and create the conditional…lawgicly that isn’t correct (confusing sufficiency for necessary). However you can flip your first premise as ‘some’ allows for it lawgicly. This would allow the ‘D’ to be in the middle when you join both premises together.
Not lawgicly,
As if you were to try and add the second premise to the first you would not be able to find a link between T and BMR without flipping your second premise around for ‘D’ to end up in the middle and create the conditional…lawgicly that isn’t correct (confusing sufficiency for necessary). However you can flip your first premise as ‘some’ allows for it lawgicly. This would allow the ‘D’ to be in the middle when you join both premises together.
I hope this helped.