User Avatar
stefanie.hinkaew
Joined
May 2025
Subscription
Free

Admissions profile

LSAT
Not provided
CAS GPA
Not provided
1L START YEAR
Not provided

Discussions

User Avatar
stefanie.hinkaew
Thursday, Jun 5, 2025

i originally selected E, second-guessed and mistook the "not just" as necessary, selected C, did blind review and realized that E was originally correct. sigh. next time i should trust myself.

0
User Avatar
stefanie.hinkaew
Thursday, Jun 5, 2025

For Question 1, I don't particularly understand why there needs to be a separate part for "relocated-panda." The way that I understood it was just

/drive out poaches -> /relocated pandas prosper.

Applying these techniques sometimes make me more confused, when I was able to understand the sentences before applying the techniques. Is my interpretation of it insufficient, or do I need to follow the rules still?

6
User Avatar
stefanie.hinkaew
Tuesday, Jun 3, 2025

For Question 2, how do I know that the word "or" is referring to an exclusive "or" and not an inclusive "or?"

1
User Avatar
stefanie.hinkaew
Tuesday, Jun 3, 2025

For Question 1, could you also simplify from weed -> meth -> /LSD -> /heroin to just weed -> /heroin?

0
User Avatar
stefanie.hinkaew
Saturday, May 31, 2025

I agree with this. I made the same error.

0

Confirm action

Are you sure?