I can definitely use the help, trying to get to min 155 for the June LSAT

I am really interested if you have time! I also take the LSAT in June and looking for a minimum 155.

D&D are terrible writers. The GoT book content stopped after season 6. Therefore, Season 7 and 8 were terrible.

I am still having trouble understanding why AC A would not be right. If more the floorboards survived from big houses than smaller houses. We can correctly assume they were made from better material which would cost more in a large amount of circumstances which supports these floors being a status symbol. AC B leaves an assumption, they might not be the cheapest, but they could be cheap. Someone from the small house could say they got the narrow boards since they are cheaper than the big ones. Could not afford the big ones which makes them not a status symbol and weakens the argument. I understand to a point why B is correct, just not why it is better than A. #help TY

I would be interested as well. I take it for the first time in June.

I think like the SAT, the LSAT is just another standardized test that does not relate to being able to graduate law school or pass the BAR.

Just a fun fact: Not a lawyer yet obviously, but I am pretty sure that if a witness gives a statement that the defendant did something like in this instance threatened her. If the defendant does not object to that claim by the witness then it is allowed as fact in court and would not be objected as hearsay. So correct me if I am wrong, but it would make C wrong in this question in real life, but this is just a scenario in this argument which is correct for this question.