Like many of you, I watch Game of Thrones. While watching the latest episode, I realized the characters make many arguments. So, I thought it would be fun to use some of their dialogue as mini LSAT lessons.

If you don't watch Game of Thrones or aren't caught up, turn away for many spoilers lie ahead.

Scene 1 - Jon Snow wields a cool conditional chain

Jon Snow: "I need you with me if we're going to beat them, and we need to beat them if you're going to survive."

survive → beat them → you with me

Jon uses "need" to indicate necessity along with "if" to indicate sufficiency. Though he states only his major premise without giving the full argument, he correctly assumes that everyone wants to "survive" which would triggers the conditional chain allowing everyone to draw the conclusion that the Free Folk ought to stick with Jon Snow.

Scene 2 - Tormund's like "Hey Snow, let me see that cool conditional chain."

Quickly following Jon's argument, Tormund wants to play with the conditional chain also. Earlier in the dialogue he mentions that Jon died for the Free Folk so "do the same" is referencing that.

Tormund: "If we are not willing to do the same for him, we're cowards. And if that's what we are, we deserve to be the last of the Free Folk."

not willing to die for Jon → cowards → deserve to be last of the Free Folk

Like Jon, Tormund also states only his major premise. He also correctly assumes that none of the Free Folk wants to be the last of the Free Folk nor do they want to be labeled cowards. Hence, by failing either of the necessary conditions, we can contrapose and arrive at the conclusion that the Free Folk "are willing to die for Jon". In context, this means join Jon in war to take back Winterfell from the Boltons.

Scene 3 - Cersei is not half as bright

I find this scene really funny. Olenna says to Cersei, "If you're half as bright as you think you are, you'll find a way out of here, too." Without missing a beat, Cersei replies "Never." Like, she just accepts Olenna's insulting premise and plays along. I almost feel bad for her.

Let's look at this in lawgic.

Olenna: Cersei is 50% as smart as Cersei thinks she is → leave

Cersei: not leaving

Conclusion: Cersei's not very bright

Scene 4 - Blackfish understands the inclusive or

In this scene, one of the Frey idiots threatens Blackfish and says "Yield the castle or I cut his throat."

Blackfish, who clearly understands the inclusive or, thinks to himself:

not yield castle → nephew's throat cut

But I remember from this 7Sage lesson that if I yield the castle, that Frey idiot might cut my nephew's throat anyway. I'm gonna call him out on his shit bluff.

Scene 5 - Jamie with a strong contrapose

This was probably my favorite scene from the episode.

Right before this scene, Jamie simultaneously insults and warns the Frey idiot that "only a fool makes threats he's not prepared to carry out."

makes threats he's not prepared to carry out → fool

Since Frey threatened Blackfish earlier but didn't carry it out, Jamie effectively called him a fool. There's the insult. But Jamie is also warning Frey because we can assume that Jamie does not think himself a fool and hence conclude that Jamie makes threats he is prepared to carry out. Jamie proceeds to make the following threat: "Now let's say I threatened to hit you unless you shut your mouth, but you kept talking. What do you think I'd do?"

not shut your dirty Frey mouth → Jamie hits you

And of course, like the idiot he is, the Frey keeps talking.

Scene 6 - Jamie is fond of unless

Jamie uses "unless" again in this scene, "Have him bathed and fed. Unless you'd like to take his place."

don't want to take his place → bathe and feed him

Jamie assumes that the idiot Frey does not want to take the prisoner's place and therefore will bathe and feed him. This time they take Jamie's threat seriously.

Scene 7 - Davos also knows how to contrapose a conditional chain too

Davos strings together a conditional argument just like Jon and Tormund did at the beginning of the episode.

Davos: "As long as the Boltons hold Winterfell, the North is divided. And a divided North won't stand a chance against the Night King."

Boltons hold Winterfell → North divided → no chance against Night King

Davos correctly assumes that Lady Lyanna Mormont wants to stand a chance against the Night King and so, contraposing back, will arrive at the conclusion that she should help them kick the Boltons out of Winterfell.

183

35 comments

  • Friday, Jun 17 2022

    That's so logical. (Leaving this comment is to see what my tail that behind the nickname is, i am curious

    1
  • Tuesday, Apr 19 2022

    D&D are terrible writers. The GoT book content stopped after season 6. Therefore, Season 7 and 8 were terrible.

    2
  • Friday, May 07 2021

    son of a bitch, im in!

    1
  • Wednesday, Nov 25 2020

    Would love it EVEN MORE if there was an "e" in "bath and feed"...

    0
  • Sunday, Jul 12 2020

    Absolutely LOVE THIS!!!

    0
  • Saturday, Jul 04 2020

    I like the logic exercise, but I have not watched GOT.

    0
  • Saturday, Jul 04 2020

    2 season later Lady Lyanna Mormont gets crushed by a Giant White Walker

    0
  • Monday, May 20 2019

    Im here a day after the show finale aired! Who else thinks John deserved better than what he got? Will there be an "Arya Sails West" spinoff? RIP to many :neutral: :(

    5
  • Friday, May 03 2019

    This upsets me because I don't watch this show and I wish I did, so I could understand this! :disappointed:

    0
  • Friday, May 03 2019

    Olenna is insulting Cersei here so I think your interpretation is correct!

    > @qiananze94805 said:

    > **Scene 5 - Jamie with a strong contrapose**

    I'm sorry for being a complete nerd about this, but it's Ja**ime** Lannister, not Ja**mie**.

    0
  • Thursday, May 02 2019

    I agree with @ngir1293288.

    Every time I read a stimulus on the LSAT, I try to adhere to the idea that I must take all the facts the LSAT provides at face value (i.e. outside of the context of the real world) and focus rather on the logical structure than the legitimacy of the facts irl. However, I'm not sure where idioms fall into this context. Are we supposed to interpret them literally? I know this is GOT so the LSAT might not rely on idioms as much, but in this case for example, we could assume that cersei could be more than half as bright as she thinks she is or less, the argument does not specify. But a reasonable person would assume that Olenna is not implying the former.

    I try to think of it this way:

    In LSAT logic, the negation of "hot" is not "cold" but "/hot"... similarly, I interpreted it as:

    Olenna: Cersei is 50% as smart as Cersei thinks she is → leave

    Cersei: /leaving

    Conclusion: Cersei is /50% as smart as she thinks she is. (whether it is more or less, we do not know)

    Am I thinking to much into this? #help

    2
  • Thursday, Nov 08 2018

    @ngir1293288 Thank you!

    0
  • Tuesday, Oct 30 2018

    > @ncnwangwu960 said:

    > Quick Question! With the Cersei v. Olenna scene, the logic confirms that Cersei is not half as smart as she thinks she is, but that doesn't necessarily preclude her being more than half as smart, does it? Just that she's not half or lower?

    I think with this, we have to take the context of the phrase into mind. When someone says "You aren't half as smart as you think you are", they're meaning "You aren't EVEN as half as smart as you think you are." But if we're just looking at the words as they exist.. you could make that assumption that she just isn't half, and could be more or less, I suppose. My gut says that if you aren't half as smart, you can't be MORE than half as smart. Sorta like a glass of milk. You can't be over half if you don't even contain half. But my understanding of the context may be impacting my view.

    Edit: My bad. The phrase was "If you are half as _bright_ as you think you are".

    1
  • Tuesday, Oct 30 2018

    Quick Question! With the Cersei v. Olenna scene, the logic confirms that Cersei is not half as smart as she thinks she is, but that doesn't necessarily preclude her being more than half as smart, does it? Just that she's not half or lower?

    1
  • Friday, May 25 2018

    I don't even watch GOT but this is hilarious!

    0
  • Friday, May 25 2018

    Interesting!

    0
  • Tuesday, Nov 28 2017

    Great example of logic

    1
  • Friday, Jun 10 2016

    I was watching the episode and suddenly asked myself, did I just chain the conditional logic up!!

    tnx @qiananze94805 for helping me to got my basic logic down :)

    2
  • Friday, Jun 10 2016

    This is the best.

    0
  • Friday, Jun 10 2016

    180 post.

    0
  • Friday, Jun 10 2016

    Does anyone know who are these people that write LSAT? Are they former lawyers?I am really curious about the people who can write such a test.

    1
  • Friday, Jun 10 2016

    Yeah @stepharizona288 , they’ve almost gotten me several times before. If they’d gone with something more subtle like @astridangieramos136 Ping it’d’ve gotten real confusing!

    0
  • Friday, Jun 10 2016

    LOL I was in a hurry and laughed when I saw it, didn't realize I clicked on it too haha @jhaldy10325 fixed :)

    0
  • Friday, Jun 10 2016

    @stepharizona288 I love this

    @astridangieramos136

    I’m surprised I’ve never seen this slip up before, haha.

    0
  • Thursday, Jun 09 2016

    Haha, awesome!

    0

Confirm action

Are you sure?