User Avatar
stephabosi229
Joined
Apr 2025
Subscription
Free
User Avatar
stephabosi229
Friday, Aug 26 2016

I was looking into this as well (I scored significantly lower on my first LR which was the first section, than on the second one), and I just chalked it up to not having been "warmed up" yet. I found on a couple different posts on the discussion forums (if you search "warm up") and there are some good suggestions such as doing 5 or so LR questions before starting a preptest.

User Avatar

Friday, Aug 26 2016

stephabosi229

5mins left on RC and 1 passage left -- Tips?

I was just doing an RC section (Particularly PT 68) and got to the last passage with a little more than 5minutes left on the clock. At this moment I wasn't sure what the best way to maximize my remaining time was.

Would one advise just reading the passage as quickly as you can and trying to answer what you can with whatever time is left after the reading?

Or

Is it more productive to go straight to the questions and try to target your reading. (I was lucky that this particular passage had a lot of line reference questions, but would the strategy be the same if this weren't the case?)

I wonder what you all think?

User Avatar
stephabosi229
Monday, Oct 24 2016

Hi @

I think you are looking at the late registration deadline (the last day to register WITH late fees applied), after which you cannot register for that LSAT sitting. If I'm not mistaken, the deadline to have registered without late charges was the 20th of Oct (the day after the Sept results came out)

User Avatar
stephabosi229
Saturday, Sep 17 2016

A->/B Allows for only 3 situations:

1. A is in (where B is out)

2. B is in (where A is out)

3. Both are out.

A(-)/B Allows for 2 situations

1. A is in (where B is out)

2. B is in (where A is out)

because of the double arrow, the rule flows in either direction (so your necessary is also your sufficient) so by having /B (where the relationship would normally fall away, leaving A to "float" instead having /B forces A to be in.

If my knowledge serves me well

So when you're drawing your in/out game board, you can properly infer for the first case that one of the out group slots will be occupied by either A/B (or both and therefore 2 slots)

Whereas on your game board for the second scenario you can properly infer that one slot will be filled on both the in AND out group.

These are my favourite rules because they make games so much easier (but only if you can figure it out from the language the rule is provided in.)

Hope that helps!

User Avatar
stephabosi229
Friday, Nov 11 2016

I 100% agree with Alex,

I think it depends on how long you will be away, if its a month or so you won't forget too much (in fact your knowledge may be solidified) but you will get rusty. If you are afraid of getting rusty this is the perfect time to use the strategies that people suggest to help improve your score.

-read publications like the Economist and American Scientist to help your RC and general reading capabilities.

-Do a logic game a day or so and repeat them ALOT until they come naturally.

-Master a logical flaw or your basic "when a sufficient condition is failed/triggered" a day or every so often.

I think these are painless things you can do to keep sharp and make some progress so when you come back to study full-time you don't have to start from scratch.

When I was studying full time, I always wished I could take a month to just learn one or two really important LSAT basics, and now you have the opportunity to do so.

I was recently given advice on how to do Reading Comp and the instructor said to first glance over the questions and get a general idea of what the questions are going to ask (i.e look for key phrases/words that are specifically ask about). This process is supposed take no longer than a minute and it is supposed to be "whatever jumped out at you and stuck as you glanced over the questions in that minute." After which, you would continue your normal RC process (but now when those words pop up as you read the passage, you'll have more awareness as to their importance.)

I can't recall if this method was specifically endorsed or discouraged on 7sage, so I thought I would ask the community.

User Avatar
stephabosi229
Wednesday, Nov 09 2016

@ Do you know where i can get a cheap one

@

?

I'm not sure if there is a physical watch (if thats what you are asking for), but I used this website ALOT

http://www.intervaltimer.com/timers/4778240-every-5-minutes-for-3-hours

and eventually I started using this coz I could customize it a bit more (I've made an example timer but feel free to make your own)

http://www.online-stopwatch.com/full-screen-interval-timer/?c=eyuurjsz7

So I would put my first interval at 10 seconds to give myself a second to get in position, then when the first alarm goes off I start.

I found that I would get through 5 questions and be thinking "no alarm? good, keep going," then the first 5mins alarm would ring half way through my 6th question and it kind of re-affirmed my speed and sense of timing.

But as stated above, the first 10 questions are the easiest (most of the time) so that can help your timing, but don't fret if you aren't hitting the 5min marks or staying under them.

If you get to the end with spare time, knowing that you still have 2 more alarms left (i.e 10more minutes) and you only have 5 questions left kind of settles your nerves -- which I think is a good rhythm to find as you practice drilling Sections for time. Eventually you start to get to the 20th question, look at your watch, you have 5-10mins left and you don't panic because you know that that is 2 or 1 more beep(s)/alarm(s) and you've done it a million times.

PS: Don't forget to keep your volume on low so it doesn't shock you as you're writing.

Good luck!

User Avatar
stephabosi229
Tuesday, Nov 08 2016

@

@

said:

Would it be advisable to use the looped countdown timer for a few practice tests to get that feel of timing down?

I would suggest doing it with timed-sections rather than full practice tests.

I agree with Alex on that.

If you are getting things correct untimed then you could also use this method to help your internal clock:

Putting the loop timer on 5min intervals throughout the 35mins so you can get a sense of pacing every 5 mins. I found that I would gradually start getting through all the questions at the 25min mark and have 10mins to go back to questions that I circled or that I couldn't get right away.

I chose this method over the 80s-method because some question types take me around 40s and others might take me over 80s

User Avatar
stephabosi229
Saturday, Aug 06 2016

You all are amazing!

Great advice :) :)

I was doing PrepTest 29 - Section 3 - Game 4 and felt pretty good going through the board set up (split it into a couple game boards and had basically figured out the whole game -- or so I thought). However, it was only when I tried to do question 21 ("Complete list of classes for Gemena") that I realized that the answers available were not part of what my possible game boards allowed. I then realized that I had misunderstood a step (particularly the "Kate is the first female but not the first student to attend a class" rule.)

Naturally, I went back and redrew my game boards because I wasn't keeping strict time, but if I were to find myself in a situation similar to this on test day, what would be the best solution?

-Is it worth it to start the game from scratch at the expense of time?

-Am I better off going through the rules and trying to amend what I mistook?

-Or should I bite the bullet and keep going through the games, all the while keeping note of the mistake I've made?

User Avatar
stephabosi229
Saturday, Dec 03 2016

@ Done! Felt much better than sept. Happy birthday

@

Eyy! Happy Birthday Dillon!!

I recently did a preptest (PT 42) and scored within my average score (Which is good!) but usually my BR score is 10 points higher (which is always encouraging) but this time around my BR score was only 5 points higher. When I looked through to see what went wrong, I noticed that a large amount of the questions I had originally gotten correct under exam conditions, I then got wrong through blind review.

-I'm just curious if this is a common occurrence?

-Have I reached a point where I can intuitively tackle questions under timed conditions but when I stop to try to figure things out without time limitations then I over think things? -- If so, I'm not sure how to deal with that (a bit of a gamble to hope that my intuition is sound)

Also, I've noticed my RC sections have consistently been horrible ranging from -13 to -11.

-What are everyone's advice on drilling RC?

-I'm trying to use the memory method but I'm not sure how much annotation I'm allowed to do as I read.

Any advice would be greatly appreciated!

Confirm action

Are you sure?