It might very well lend itself to catching the error, but even if you assume that the customer is honest and will report the error, the stimulus talks only about it being "extremely unlikely that the error will not be detected by the bank's internal audit procedures".

Can you really say a statement sent to the customer is:

1) Internal

2) An audit procedure

I think that's why you can eliminate it so quickly. It's really neither.

I originally chose (A), but changed it to (D) in the blind review. But I'm not sure the explanation for eliminating (D) is really valid. Sure you can assume that maybe the auditors are really really bad and the audit procedures are bad, but you could just as easily be applied to the correct answer (A). Maybe the computer program used to double-check large transactions is really bad and the procedures it used are bad.

Still struggling with this question, but I think it comes down to the degree of specificity in (A). The stimulus talks about large sums of money, for (D) we have no clue what those auditors are doing, but (A) we know that computer program is dedicated to large transactions...

Thanks for the quick response. I just tried it and didn't see it again. Don't want to spam with useless comments so I'll wait to try it again when I have something useful to say :) Likely I just messed up a step or thought it was at the top when it wasn't...now I'll pay more attention...

Yeah, subtitles or a voice over option would make this even more useful!

I can pretty much only do one a week, on Saturday. I spend the rest of the weekend doing blind review.

I should note just taking a practice test does nothing for you really. The blind review is what is truly helpful, taking the time to understand why you got something wrong, or why an answer you choose is correct and all the wrong answers are wrong.

Man this one was rough.

I see what C is doing now that it is explained to me, but I feel like you have to make all sorts of assumptions about the being inadequate studies and what types of patients are treated at each hospital. I immediately dismissed C, since the premise mentions multiple studies and says rates were "similar for patients with similar illnesses."

Can't thank you enough!! This was a great explanation for a tough question!

C really confused me. Even in Blind Review I kind of understood that E wasn't perfect, but was really confused by C.

The stem says:

Final Theory in Physics -> Rejected

Q is a final theory in Physics

----

It will be rejected

But for C I read that as:

Never won a chess tournament

-------

She will not win this tournament

I think I was confused in that it never said she had actually entered ANY chess tournaments. If it had said "Every Chess Tournament your sister has entered she has not won, therefore she will not win this tournament." there would have been no question in my mind. Or even better "Every Chess Tournament your sister has entered she has not won, she entered the chess tournament today, she will not win."

I'm always caught when I think LSAT is trying to trick me into making assumptions, vs when you have to sometimes assume things....any tricks for knowing when assumptions like above are acceptable?

>Wendy cannot be fastest

I'd write this directly on the game board. If they were numbered 1 to 4, with 1 being the slowest, and 4 being the fastest, I'd write in a little W with a slash below it under 4. That indicates that 4 can't be the fastest. I'd also add in the helpful inference that 4 must be a V/Z. To be redundant you could also do a rule that says W4 with a slash through it.

Like this (forgive terrible Microsoft Paint Skills).

http://imgur.com/8vEU271

> and there are no ties.

I don't usually write down no doubling up type rules unless there is twist. If I have 4 open spots, 1-4, unless I draw 4 open spots above them I just assume it's one per spot.

And like the others have pointed out, once you've gotten that far it's easy to solve for all possibilities.

Are you enrolled in the course by any chance? If you are should review those sections, diagramming is covered in depth as are the different LG types. If you aren't, I highly recommend it. It's great, can't imagine anyone taking the LSAT without it!

Might have heard about it, but it really works for this. The simple answer is the fool proof method. Print 10 copies, do them once a day until you get it. Do it enough and you'll slowly start to make the inferences yourself. Worked for me, of course I'm still not doing them fast enough so I'm keeping at it....

http://classic.7sage.com/how-to-get-a-perfect-score-on-the-logic-games/

And don't worry about memorizing it. As long as you are doing the inferences from memory, really that's important part. Time and time again similar games rely on the same inferences.

Was having the same issue again today, I switched to HTML5 player seems to work without any of the hiccups...

The main question I have is will I have to flip a page, or will both pages face each other when the book is open.

I don't think they are more difficult. I took it to mean they are trying to put the focus where it belongs, are you able to do the logic games in the time allotted. Not are you able to do the logic games in the time allotted while writing really small in a constrained space!

Love the example...If I wanted your money I'd argue that you owe me $100K for any child born anywhere in the world while we were married!