User Avatar
sungah0726531
Joined
Apr 2025
Subscription
Free
User Avatar
sungah0726531
Tuesday, Oct 06 2020

Thank you!

0
PrepTests ·
PT149.S1.Q16
User Avatar
sungah0726531
Sunday, Sep 20 2020

E is not a flaw in the argument. Look at it this way.

Galindo's conclusion:

A background is no guarantee of success = Success →/background (Simply put, background doesn't necessarily lead to success)

How is this supported in the argument?

He gives one instance where a person with background didn't lead to success.

Background →/Success

Contrapositive:

Success →/background

This is totally valid within Galindo's argument.

The problem lies where Galindo uses this argument to refute Fremont's argument -- Viable Candidate → Background

Taken together, Galindo's argument is valid within his argument, but he can't refute Fremont's argument because Fremont never said Background is a sufficient condition. Fremont simply says if you want to be considered as a viable candidate, the minimum requirement is that you have some background. However, Galido refutes this argument by saying since background doesn't lead to success, you don't need to have background to be considered a viable candidate. See where the flaw is?

2
User Avatar
sungah0726531
Friday, Aug 14 2020

I wish they made this feature too

2
User Avatar

Monday, Jun 15 2020

sungah0726531

LSAT Flex June just took it (huge complaint)

I can't discuss the test material, but I do have a huge complaint about the flex. The proctor kept interrupting me during the test on every section because they couldn't see the paper I was writing on. It was absolutely ridiculous. They took up atleast 3-5 minutes on every section telling me to be in the camera. I was right infront of the computer but i guess when i put my head down to write they couldn't see what I was writing. These things were not notified to me and they didn't warn me about these possible interruptions. So, i was really disorientated when they proctor started talking during the test. 3-5 mins was only the actual time they took up, but by continuously interrupting, they kept breaking my concentration. It was absolutely ridiculous. I wanna add that I'm not a low scorer, im in the 170+ range. For future flex takers, firmly tell your proctor to SHUT THE FUCK UP before you take the test. Literally wasted a year of studying for the June test only to be sabotaged by the proctor in India. Excuse my language but you would understand if you were in my shoes.

13
PrepTests ·
PT119.S2.Q3
User Avatar
sungah0726531
Sunday, May 10 2020

is the test an advance in medicine tho? wouldn't it be technology? it clearly says that medicine didn't advance. This was a horrible question.

18
User Avatar
sungah0726531
Friday, Mar 20 2020

I scored a low 150s on my diagnostic and I'm working my way up to mid-high 160s now. I would definitely like to study with you. We could share our study tips and discuss some PTs.

0
PrepTests ·
PT116.S3.Q2
User Avatar
sungah0726531
Tuesday, Mar 10 2020

How does A support the hypothesis?

How does a neighbor having seen the back door closing help identify whether it was the cat or the children?

#help (Added by Admin)

4
User Avatar
sungah0726531
Friday, Feb 21 2020

prepare for three years of physical assaults by homeless people, and sometimes murder.

3

Confirm action

Are you sure?