Subscription pricing
Philosopher: Effective tests have recently been developed to predict fatal diseases having a largely genetic basis. ████ ███ ███ █████ █████ █ ██████ ███ ██ ██████ ████ ██ ███████ ██ ███ ███████████ ██ ████ ████████████████ ███████████ ████████ ████████ ██ ███ ███ ████ ██ ███████ ████ ████ ███████████ ██████ █████ ████████ ████ ███ ████ ███ █ ███████ ████ ██ ████ █████ ███ █████████ ███ ██████ ██ █████ ███████ ██ ████ ███████ ████ ██████ ███ ████████ ██ ███████ ████ ██████ ████████ █████ ██████ ██ ████ █████████ ██ ████
Summary
The philosopher says that we can now effectively test people for some genetically-based deadly diseases, so we can warn people in advance if they’re at risk. Unfortunately, we can’t prevent most of these conditions yet. What’s more, learning that you will get a deadly and unpreventable disease can be psychologically harmful. So, the philosopher wonders whether we should use these tests at all.
Strongly Supported Conclusions
The philosopher’s claims support these principles:
Having more knowledge of one’s future health risks is not always beneficial for health.
If new medical tests risk causing people harm while not offering the possibility of a cure, it may be best not to conduct the tests.
Developments in medicine can lead to questions of how and when they should be used.
3.
Which one of the following ██████████ ██ ████ ███████████ ██ ███ █████ ██ ███████ █████████ ██ ███ ████████████
a
The advance of ████████ █████ ██ ███████ █████████ ██ █████ ████████
b
The advance of ████████ ███████ ███ ████████ ██ █████ ███████ ████████ ███ ██████
c
Medical technologies continue ██ ████████ ██████████ ███ █████████ ███ █████████████ ██ ████████
d
The more we ████ ██ ██████ ███ ████ ██ ███████ ███ ██████ ██ █████
e
The advance of ██████████ ██ ██ ████████████ ██████