I am trying to figure out which one is experiment section and trying to score myself.
Any advice, suggestion and idea?
For three LR section, I am pretty sure which one is the experimental section because the second one I took has one stimulus but two questions (Q9-Q10), which is certainly not the modern LSAT style(after PT60s)
Thanks for your post. It seems that it you talk anything about the real test details you will be banned at tls....
I am trying to figure out which one is experiment section and trying to score myself.
Any advice, suggestion and idea?
In China, we also got a "Nelson Mandela" but it seems he will never ever get out of that prison.
Those !kung women seems to be in the same ethnic group with the people in the "The Gods Must Be Crazy".
For B, if "often" doesn't mean "most" , then Jolene may also agree that some shrimp farming yields a quick, easy profit because she said some shrimp farms have proved unsustainable and have been quickly abandoned.
Also, if you want, I can do the exact PT you do on the same day so we can go through the problem together.
Sure Michelle, I am Justin also at Philly. E-mail me sunyuchencn@.com.
I have done all the PTs from 36 to 66 so if you have questions feel free to ask me.
Also, cause it is my last semester at Penn I spent most of time redo those PTs.
Hope you enjoy your test.
You misunderstand the passage. From passage, we know that abstract expressionism means "a movement in which painters conveyed their private attitudes and emotions using abstract way" and second generation of abstract expressionists also are overly lyrical. Rebelling against those expressionist means that our Lichtenstein comic art is impersonal and not emotional. So "inner turmoil" is wrong character here.
Bold lines and primary color is the remarkable character of pop art so this trait is right.
For the right answer E, we can see "magazine advertisement" as "commercial-art"(line 3) and "comment on society's values" as "parody (line 34)".
http://classic.7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-43-section-3-question-10/
Can anyone help me about the PT43-S3-Q1?
I understand A can fill the gap but it seems more like a sufficient assumption because of the word "only". So if I negate A and financial reward is not the only incentive, the conclusion seems to be ok. Because, you know, what if financial reward is the primary incentive?
and I chose c because when I negate c, I ask myself what if the cost is more significant than the future profit? the conclusion seems to fall apart.
Many Thanks.
Your score is impressive and amazing.
I have done all PT from 46 to 66 and left last three for the last week.
Now I am doing PT from 36 to 45 and I am around 167-169 now.
I am quite hesitate to take the October test cuz I won't take it unless I got stable score beyond 173...
wow, that's amazing. Hope next year I can end up in my dream school and I will definitely purchase 7sage law school service!
what's the meaning of" state's chips" in line 29? Is "state" here meaning "government" or something else?
JY,can you post the video of this one? I am still totally confused about why B is right and A is wrong.
For choice B, I wonder if "generalization" and "conclusion" is the same thing in argument part question?
what's the meaning of " lack of evidence against a view" ? or here should be "lack of evidence of opposing view"? what's the meaning of against here? "opposing" or just means neutral "about" ?
For question 10, Chopin adopt "detached narrative stance" cuz she describe story in "uninflected manner"?
Is the uninflected manner and "detachment" the same thing. I check dictionary but uninflected doesn't have that meaning.
https://www.google.com/search?q=uninflected&oq=uninflected&aqs=chrome.0.69i57j0l3j69i62.11611j0&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8#fp=874ce91939cc774&q=uninflected+
is "few" and "a few" the same thing or there is difference between these two words?
I can eliminate all ABCE, but I still can't find why D is right. For the same reason we can't draw causation from correlation in ABE we can't decide whether television doesn't cause a decline of book titles.
Jon's explanation is wrong for many layers.
First, for A it seems to be BP/-->C not BP--C/, I think he draw completely opposite map.
Second, he didn't catch the real reason about why A is wrong. A is wrong because it didn't do anything about the gap in the stimulus between "many people took certain action" and "everyone ought to take action".
@ Shin, you can look at my new comments. Any thoughts?
Also, I think Jon's explanation about PT55 S1 Q21 may be wrong. http://classic.7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-55-section-1-question-21/
Please first take a look at two really tough question PT53 sec1 Q16 and PT55-S1-Q21
For PT55-S1-Q21, it seems to be most supported question, but actually it turns out to be sufficient assumption question, which the correct answer build up the gap between "many people took certain action" and "everyone ought to take action".
For PT53 sec1 Q16, I think if LSAC change the question type to necessary assumption this one will become way easier. But instead of asking assumption, they just throw Must Be True question in front of you. That makes this question much harder.
For most of inference and most supported question, there is no argument. So we can just draw the conclusion or reference based on the stimulus. But for some special inference and most supported question, there did exist an argument, sometimes with terrible flaw or gap, and then the question require you to draw the inference, then the right answer choice about this type of inference about should be the choice that build up the gap.
This type of question is really tough cause it is counter-intuition and against our judgement about the question type. They turn inference question to be assumption question.
Any thoughts? comments?
For question 12, I am between A and C. For Choice A, passage A did present lots evidence that directly counters claim made in Passage B. For example, Passage B made a claim that furbearing mammals none of the species can be considered threatened in North America. And Passage A represented the evidence that serious reduction in aquatic furbearer productivity have been observed. And for choice C, did “display an awareness” means cast doubt on passage A ? I don’t know the meaning of “display an awareness” here, I look up dictionary and find aware means “having or showing realization”, which seems to be irrelevant here.
I just bought some books about personal statement on Amazon and hope it helps.