User Avatar
taslimtavarez936
Joined
Apr 2025
Subscription
Free
User Avatar
taslimtavarez936
Friday, Jan 26 2024

Don't give up! I've been intermittently studying for this test over the past five years. At the start of 2023, I committed myself wholeheartedly to studying. Back in 2019, my initial diagnostic score was a discouraging 139. However, in November 2023, I took the official exam and scored a 161. Even now, I continue to push myself and study every day, hoping to retake the exam later this year to score a 165+.

My biggest takeaway from this journey is the importance of understanding the fundamentals. English is my second language, so I struggled with reading comprehension in LR and RC and parsing out convoluted grammar. I spent six months only learning about grammar (modifiers, embedded clauses, referential phrases, etc.) and identifying arguments' premises and conclusions. The top 4 things I needed to ingrain in my brain before learning about question types were:

Grammar

Identifying the Premise and Conclusion

Understanding Conditional Logic + Memorizing Logical Indicators

Reading with my imagination (in other words, I try to visualize what I'm reading in my mind; this helps with retaining and understanding what I read)

I also read "The Loophole" by Ellen Cassidy and "Reading with the Right Brain: Read Faster by Reading Ideas Instead of Just Words" by David Butler. Both of these books were instrumental in helping me improve my reading skills.

I hope this was somewhat helpful. I'm confident that you can achieve your goals. Keep at it!

User Avatar
taslimtavarez936
Wednesday, Apr 26 2023

Thank you so much! I really appreciate your thorough explanation.

PrepTests ·
PT147.S4.Q9
User Avatar
taslimtavarez936
Wednesday, Aug 23 2023

The argument makes the mistake of assuming that the three most important attributes are the only important attributes. A university degree might be the fourth most important attribute, and therefore going to university would still help.

Hello everyone! I'm still going through the CC and reached the section about "Some and Most Relationships." I understand that the negation of "all" is "some not."

"All A's are B's."

Group 1 translation: A→B

Negation: A←some→/B

This might be a silly question, but does this mean that all the logical indicators in group 1 should be negated this way? For example:

"As long as there are A's, there are B's."

Group 1 translation: A→B

Negation: A←some→/B

And does this also apply to groups 2, 3, and 4? Does "all" basically represent all the universal quantifiers we learned in "Intro to Logic"?

Thank you!

User Avatar

Friday, Feb 10 2023

taslimtavarez936

When "or" means "and" does it belong to Group 3?

Hi all!

My understanding is the following:

  • inclusive “or” gives you group 3
  • “not both” gives you group 4.
  • “either or but not both” gives you the bi-conditional group.
  • However, when "or" means "and" in a sentence, do we follow Group 3 rules? How would we write it in Lawgic?

    Example: Jane is a faster eater than either Mary or Jon.

    Thanks in advance!

    User Avatar
    taslimtavarez936
    Sunday, Feb 05 2023

    Thank you, everyone!

    PrepTests ·
    PT122.S4.Q8
    User Avatar
    taslimtavarez936
    Wednesday, Oct 04 2023

    A

    Confirm action

    Are you sure?