Hey, I fall into that category. Testing in April and interested in connecting

My only issue with this is that if Calcium Carbonate were to neutralize stomach acid at amounts say, 60 g or above, you can still characterize the description as "Calcium carbonate has the capacity to neutralize stomach acid"

I see your points, but I'm not sure how the LSAT gets around that one. I think that's what a lot of people are struggling with here.

how should we interpret "the only" in this question?

I see it as two ways:

1. As introducing the sufficient condition - "If 'obligation all parties have', then 'act in best interests"

2. "Intuitive"/Natural Meaning - Producers/Consumers are only obligated to act in their best interests (which puts "obligation" in the necessary condition.

Hi, wanted to follow up on this - isn't "the only" a sufficient indicator? I diagrammed it the same as Trust the Process above and did "If obligation, then act in best interests"

obviously, the conclusion assigns "best interest" as the sufficient condition though. . .