I feel like he needs to draw the diagram differently to create a better understanding. If you claim sufficiency for a subset, then the arrows need to point down. However, if you claim necessity for a superset, the arrow needs to go upwards. I feel like that may make better sense if trying to graph it on your own.
3
Topics
PT Questions
Select Preptest
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.
I feel like he needs to draw the diagram differently to create a better understanding. If you claim sufficiency for a subset, then the arrows need to point down. However, if you claim necessity for a superset, the arrow needs to go upwards. I feel like that may make better sense if trying to graph it on your own.