Qn 15 is excellently-thought out, wow.

#help

Still struggling to be persuaded on this one.

That % of fat consumed remained the same but fat consumption increased doesn’t necessarily mean that they were eating more food. Logically speaking. To assert that, we are compelled to make an assumption about the nutritional composition of the individuals' diet, something which the LSAT apparently never does.

All the consumption increase might be 100% vegetables and no fat. That disproves the supposed correct answer that they must have been eating more.

To assume B as the correct answer requires the assumption that ‘eating more’ necessarily means ‘consuming more fat.’

#help

This was a weird one. I see the reasoning, but wouldn't choosing B as the correct answer require that we assume the nutritional composition of these people's food (ie. for them to have consumed more fat means the increasing food intake was directly proportional to the increase in fat consumption?)

They could be eating less food, but slightly more fat.

Why must B necessarily be correct?

#help

I chose D because I imagined there was a hole (above the stalagmite) at one point through which the water dripped.

With B, how could the water have dropped from above (at any time)? It is said the only source is through an underwater tunnel.

But if the claim is true, and C is correct, then red cars would be banned.

I thought we have to accept the truth of ALL the premises on the LSAT. It says here that "If...true." Why would we question that? #help

#help On this, how do we know that H's latest novel does have at least one property of good literature if we have not been told that good literature can consist in any one of 'maturity, complexity or grace?' There seems to be a leap in logic to me.

following

I thought Main Point questions directly reference the conclusion. Why is that not the case here? #feedback #help

#help would someone help explain exactly why D is wrong?

Interested!

What does 'in general' mean in the correct answer choice? A category 'The Arts' or funding something 'generally' ie. as a collective decision?

#help (Added by Admin)

Interested!

I discredited B because I thought there was no way the LSAT would require that we make the assumption that short attention spans meant children were harder to teach. It sounds exactly like the sort of thing we'd be told NOT to assume.

Interested, too!