im interested!!!

hey! i am going through the same thing: i'm also taking the oct and nov lsats, and I just took my first PT after feeling anxious about it for a while. i was definitely nervous, but after doing BR, taking the test is much less intimidating. I also am starting to take timed sections when I can so the time constraint on the full test is not as big a source of stress. honestly, it makes me feel better that someone else has this fear too-- i thought it was just me-- but we got this! :)

it's just noticing the answer choice's form of the argument or the type of reasoning used in the argument to see if it matches that of the stimulus. hope that helps!!

not the erasure of women, wowwwwwwwwwwwww

hi im interested!

I think it's because when we say it has to be bran or Robb, it's not excluding the possibility that it can be bran AND rob. if we know Joffrey does not kill bran, we know that he must kill Robb. if Joffrey does not kill Robb, then he must kill bran. this is because he needs to kill at least one of them. if he kills bran, that does not mean he does not kill Robb as B→ /R implies. we can't make that claim because perhaps Joffrey kills bran AND Robb or he decides to be tame and just kills bran lol, the point is we don't know. i hope this helps! this is just my thought process!

im interested!

im interested!

im interested!

how come in the example “I’m hugging you because I miss you” because is not an indicator? if the sentence was “because I’m hugging you, I miss you,”would “I’m hugging you” be a premise and “I miss you” be a conclusion? I could ask myself "why would I believe this conclusion/aka why do I believe I'm being missed" and respond "I'm being hugged." #help