Indiana no, but most schools yes

midnight.

It doesnt really matter i got mine last year

I had a similar thing happen to me. Its crushing, but use it as motivation for your next test.

I second this.

I second this

@davidbusis895 I was wondering if it is possible for 7sage to make a table of 2020-21 law school opening admission dates? Thank you for your time!!

no

The tests are not the same so some will be better than others. You have to see how you are overall improving in a section like if in 2 tests you are getting -5's in games instead of -9's. My diagnostic was 151, my high PT was 168. I was stuck in the high 150's for a long time until I worked RC and LR and got up to 163 a ton of times. The uptick was extra RC work. It all takes time. If you have more questions PM me.

Don't think about it. That happened to me destroyed my confidence so badly i sucked on the test. I had to go and retake.

One bad score doesn't define you. Think of the real thing as just another practice test.

BIG OOOOOOOF

Good job! The one thing i worry about is using such old tests you will not have practice with the comparative passages which are very common on the new tests, but otherwise again NICE!

its best to start with simple and relative ordering as those are the most straight forward. Then go to Grouping starting with distribution then to in/out then go to grid games as those are becoming more common. Grids are not hard per se but take a lot of time and it takes practice to get fast due to the large amount of info in a grid game.

I BR ed and I also just reviewed my advice is early in your studying BR but once you have taken 20+ tests just review it saves time and allows you to get back to working on your weak points quicker. BR is a good way to internalize the learning but after 20+ tests you kind of know what is going on and benefit more from specific practice of your weaknesses than redoing then going over every question you were not sure about because during test day you will be unsure and its best to get used to the feeling of not being certain with an answer.

My best advice is 1. learn LR until you are getting -2 or less best and most reliable section never changes THAT much from test to test. 2. learn flaw, strengthen/weaken, Suff and nec assumption questions as those are the most common but remember there is no such thing as low yield there could be 4 paradox questions you never know as these LR sections have become themed in recent years with low yield topics. 3. DO NOT NEGLECT RC!. I cannot stress that enough my first take i got destroyed by RC because I thought that I read daily so why focus on reading. LSAT reading is harder than daily reading and requires practice to get it all done in the 35 minute window. That is my advice I have taken the exam and am awaiting a score but my pretest score was upper 160's from a 152 diagnostic so these tidbits have worked for me at least

Train for what you're doing. If its three sections do three. There is no point in overtraining, like why train a weekly marathon if you're going to race a 5k.

So what i noticed with the newer tests is 1. the answers are less obvious they tend to be more subtle and 2. they lock into one question type more in a section. What i mean by that is that one test my give you 5-6 of a type and the 60's tend to give more variety. this has been my experience but personally i do better with the newer tests for some reason.

Honestly this is the secret to better LR and RC sections!

i say 30+

This in my opinion is the rote memorization part of the LSAT. look and study flaws from an LSAT book then the similarities will pop out at you. This skill is first knowledge and then practice. Also, harder flaw questions will be harder to see the flaw. If you need any clarifications feel free to reach out

Does anyone think scores will be released earlier than June 5th?

What do we think the curve is y'all?