I had a conversation recently with a lawyer that I know, who recommended that I take the lsat in April or June instead of February. He told me that he remembers that being the time of year where they experiment a little with the questions? Can anyone confirm or deny this? Is it the kind of thing where I would be doomed if I took the test in February lol
@InderpalSingh From what I have gathered from the comments, it sounds like some level of logical sense still matters for an argument. I can't say "my fish is healthy, because i walked my dog this morning." Even though it sounds like an argument due to the connecting word, it is not reasonable that these statements support each other. Someone lmk if i am wrong about this
@ArthurMorgan I think yes, since it makes logical sense, but it is a little fishy without "because." If it read "most chefs can make a delicious omelet, because most chefs have extensive culinary knowledge," that would easily be an argument.
@unknown number 7 is pretty similar to the most x are y and all y are z, so most x are z argument discussed in the first lessons. Most chefs (x) have extensive culinary knowledge (y). All chefs with extensive culinary knowledge (y) can make a delicious omelet (z). So, most chefs (x) can make a delicious omelet (z).
Is "if my experience is anything to go by" a minor premise for "no patients are going to ask for access to their records anyway" (minor conclusion)? Or is it not because of the "if?"