Add me to your list please! I'm planning on taking it in June.

Thank you for the very helpful advice. You guys are awesome!

@ and @ I did not know about the benefit of applying ED to Northwestern, nor about their scholarship. You guys totally gave me something to work towards.

@ Yes! I do need those LORs. Will work on it. Thanks so much!

Scored a couple of points less than my PTs. Taking it again in September.

so happy for you!

For foolproofing your LG after the 2 months of cc, which tests did you use?

31 here and probably wouldn't start law school till I'm 33

I will not be able to finish taking and BR-ing PT 60 by Tuesday. But I do want to be prepared ahead of time for the next session. Will you guys do another session on Tuesday Mar 27? If so, which PT will you BR?

Yes, most likely. It would also depend on whether I have achieved mastery on those question types or not. I am taking the test in June, so I am reviewing old PT notes periodically, and looking for places where I can improve.

I am documenting them in one spreadsheet in google drive (titled LSAT PT Notes).

I start a new sheet for each PT that I take, and mark the questions I didn't get right with red, along with an explanation next to the question number.

If I do understand the answer and/or got the question right, but I think I should review it before the actual test day, I mark it purple.

If I got it right and don't need to come back to it, I mark it green.

I used three watches for the June test too. No problem at all. Bought each of them from Walmart for 8 bucks each.

Yes, COD in Glen Ellyn would work.

Thanks

@ and @ Keep me posted on when you guys are meeting up and if I can drive up to the city that morning, I definitely will.

I'm doing PTs on Saturday mornings in Naperville, usually at the public library close by. Might be a long drive for you though.

This RC section killed me.

I am from Houston, but living in Chicago now. What kind of law are you interested in?

Also a NTS, and I'm looking to find a mentor in Chicago, esp someone who has attended Northwestern or Univ of Chicago, with a husband and young kids in tow.

Since the conclusion is comparing the reliability of both numbers, and saying figure 1 is more reliable than figure 2, the flaw must be in an assumption that points to lower reliability of figure 1. Answers D and E talk about accuracy, only B finds problems with figure 1's reliability.