Respectfully, my undergraduate GPA is nothing to flaunt. I had a life, issues etc. Going to law school was not on my mind at the time. Therefore, what are my best options for getting into law school? What do you recommend?
- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
Dear Victoria:
I.... don't know about the 8-12 hours of studying per day. Personally, I've heard that people get burned out studying that long. I would at least recommend 4 to 5 hours daily. However, it is an extremely hard test and one should study as much as possible.
7Sage is great and highly ranked as one of the best for LSAT prep. This Discussion Forum is a wonderful support network.
If this is something that you really want, don't give up. The LSAT is a process. You have to take it one step at a time and master the skills. Once you achieve that goal, then it is like a walk in the park.
Happy Studying..................... !!!!!!!
Thanks for the Comment Post. You are not alone. I must join you on that.
I took a moment to watch a movie and listened to a few cartoons for laughter. But we have to think about our goal.
Don't beat up on yourself. Take a break, regroup and move on. If you have to redo, then repeat. Like the Michael Jackson song says, "Don't stop till you get enough..." (LSAT).
Well....., I have some encouraging words too.
Someone told me you have to take baby steps. Some study is better than no study.
However, you must consider your goal and score on the test. In addition, I would say your background, strengths and weaknesses regarding your prep.
A one hour quality study session is better than 4 or 5 hours of not getting anything accomplished, brain drain and hang it up. However, if you are a serious student and are disciplined to handle that I would say go for it. To each his/her own.
I have distractions that cramps my style and mess up my game plan. I need encouragement too. This was helpful for me.
This is a hard test. The LSAT is no joke and no laughing matter. They make it hard for a reason.
Lines 7 and 8 are freezing my comprehension, relegate, periphery and antecedents. Any suggestions. The author lost me.
When I get lost, it's hard for me to determine if the big picture of the passage is positive, negative or neutral, agree or disagree.
Please help. Thank you.
Admin Note: https://classic.7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-62-section-1-passage-4-passage/
I am taking a brief study break and reviewing in my mind some of the things I know or have learned. However, when I look at the things I need to review and learn it's like OMG, brain freeze, headache, got to step away from it all for a second, regroup and return back to it.
How do we deal with all this information? I feel like there are so many skills to know and learn in such little time. As soon as I master one technique, it's like I have to review the other techniques that I have forgotten. I am trying to stay focused, but SMH.....
Any suggestions????
The study guide didn't give a preptest number. The solutions state it to be a descriptive tone or attitude of the author"Ivory Tower Theory". I looked up the term and found it to be a metaphor.
I have issues with humanities passages especially the tone and attitude questions.
This whole test seems like a lot of information or TMI, too much information to know, learn and study, the flaws, conditionals, and hidden literary devices. OMG
Thanks for the encouragement.
Suggestions welcome.
Thank you. I greatly appreciate your comment.
I heard that literary devices were not tested on the LSAT and not to worry about high level advanced vocabulary.
However, I was reading a study guide that gave an explanation of author's attitude and tone by way of a literary device for which I had to look up the meaning.
I was not an English or Philosophy major. The high level vocabulary and metaphors are destroying my progress and success. I am able to handle/understand the context cues as per science and legal jargon, but it's the thousands of other words that concern me. Even for words that I thought I was familiar with, the connotations flip and throw me for a loop.
Any suggestions please......?????
September 4th, that's my birthday. What a great day this is going to be.
Thanks......!!!!!
I was told that LSAC uses a different test for people who receive accommodations and that the test is much harder for the basic reason of having more time. I was debating whether to request accommodations and how the law schools admissions view people who take the test with accommodations.
Sometimes I feel like I just want to take it, get it over with and mark whatever. However, I need a good score and to do my best.
Please send me the youtube link too. I've been ill these past few days and just getting into studying.
Thanks for asking the question. I'm in the same boat.
My undergraduate gpa was slightly below a 3.0. However, my graduate gpa was significantly above 3.0 and my degrees are in different fields.
I was advised by an admissions rep at my choice law school that I needed a 177 LSAT score. That stressed me out.....!!!!! This is not a top tier law school, but extremely competitive.
So, I'm thinking about choosing a different law school and doing my best on the LSAT.
I don't know if this helps. I still have issues with intermediate conclusions and this particular problem struck me below the belt when I first attempted it because I thought I was confident with conclusion question and I got it wrong. However, when I went back to study what I did wrong, I looked at it as a policy recommendation for sentence 1. Whereby, sentence 2 and 3 in my opinion are premises. Thereby, respectfully speaking, in my opinion, this whole LSAT test is confusing.
I'm not an expert at this, so if anybody wants to jump in and help, please do so. Moreover, thanks for asking the question. I'm a shy person and I usually hesitate asking questions.
This is a good question. It doesn't have any indicator words, neither the "should or ought" for policy recommendation. Moreover, the answer choices all look tempting.
Respectfully speaking, if it is not considered a policy recommendation, then I guess it is like a thesis statement. Thereby, bottom line for whatever it is worth, sentence 1 is the conclusion. However, now that I am able to find or determine the correct conclusion in the stimuli, it is selecting the correct answer choice that is striking me out. Wherefore, certain matters in the answer choices looked attractive.
In selecting the right answer choice for conclusion questions, you must consider one thing and that is the wrong answer choices and why they are wrong. The correct answer closely matches the conclusion and wrong answers can be premises or a mess and mixture of issues. Thereby, if you pick or determine the wrong sentence, phrase, clause or wording in the stimulus as the conclusion, you are at risk of selecting the wrong answer choice.
This exam is very technical. I was hooked on answer choice (E), which I finally understand now the reason why it is incorrect while writing this post.
The star of the show is the term "pit bull" and the phrase, clause or words tacked on to it in sentence 1 up to the comma. The rest of the sentence and everything thereafter, I would consider premises in support of that one little phrase or clause.
Then you have to go into the meat of the clause, first part of sentence 1, and with other questions, understand or determine what it is saying or referring to. Answer choice (E) through me a loop because it was talking about some breeds. It's not "some breeds", it's "pit bull. Which is answer choice (C)
Respectfully speaking, this is not a test to play jet plane on when you are first starting out. I hope this helps.
Hey...., I'm doing it now......
This is a hard test........................!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I would say study as much as you can, whenever you can.
Thank you so much. I greatly appreciate your help. This is a hard test.
It's the June 2007, S2.Q10.
Although I am getting better at locating the conclusion in the stimulus, the answer choices are throwing curve balls and hard punches below the belt. Can someone help me please......?
On this question, while I was able to understand and agree that the conclusion was sentence 1, the answer choices all look so..... attractive and it is difficult to understand why the answers are right and wrong. In speeding through this question, I took a second look thereby, in studying and going back, they all look so... wrong to the point that I would disagree that any of them are correct.
The correct AC, (B), allegedly makes a recommendation "..., is advisable...", and allegedly includes additional information as per "..., in as high proportion of their experiments....".
Help..........!!!!!!!?????
I assume it is a relationship between the words "possible" and "can"?
Admin Note: https://classic.7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-june-2007-section-2-question-10/
My comment is that they may be old, but I would study and practice on anything I could get my hands on. The more the merrier.
Hey....., I'm in the same boat...!!!!
This is so..... wonderful. Thank you. A friend of mine graduated from Cornell. I hear it is a great school.
Thank you so much. I greatly appreciate your help.