- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
Admissions profile
Discussions
Hi all,
Question regarding study abroad grades. I was in undergrad at a Canadian university and studied abroad for one semester in France through my schools program.
In my transcripts these grades just show up as credits (signifying pass because it was pass/fail).
However, I do have the transcript for my actual grades (based on a scale out of 20).
Do these actual grades get calculated into my LSAC GPA? Does anyone know if I have to submit these grades?
I keep seeing mixed things online and cannot find a clear answer.
Please let me know!
Are there any full practice tests with only LR and RC?, taking the August LSAT and wondering how to practice the full test.
What are the other August LSAT takers doing?
To add: would stating that "Although Krill is more productive, Delacruz is fully qualified and already works at Arvue" be incorrect because being fully qualified and working at Arvue is a sufficient condition, and we don't know what happens in this situation since we can't negate FQ-A to make it FQ-A (this is information we don't have), therefore hiring Delacruz has to be based on productivity which relies on not working at Arvue?
Not sure if I answered my question but would be helpful if someone could guide/affirm my thinking
#help #feedback
I am confused on how we were able to just assume that neither of them work at Arvue... I know none of the answer choices had this option but how does the portion of answer E) "none of the candidates working at Arvue", further justify this argument to hire Delacruz over Krill- what purpose/trigger is it serving? My guess is that, because we had to choose one candidate over the other, it mbt that none work at Arvue since we weren't given any tools on how to choose one candidate over the other except for based on productivity which can only occur if they don't work there. Therefore it we must assume that neither work at Arvue since we have to choose one candidate over the other.
My issue is that couldn't it be true that maybe Delacruz is a candidate and that he is fully qualified but also already working at Arvue? - another reason (based on the premises) to choose him over Krill. Seemingly nothing is suggesting otherwise and I anticipated an answer choice more along the lines of: "Although Krill is more productive, Delacruz is fully qualified and already works at Arvue" - would this be a sufficient assumption answer?
Could this perhaps be the reason this is a SA and not MBT since there are multiple possibilities?
#help
Whats a domain
#help