User Avatar
vbordign134
Joined
Apr 2025
Subscription
Free
User Avatar
vbordign134
Monday, Jun 27 2022

Would not say this is a famous flaw such as part to whole, but rather which answer choice is accurately descriptive of what’s going on?

User Avatar
vbordign134
Saturday, Jun 25 2022

Really work on seeing the difference between them on your down to two.

User Avatar
vbordign134
Saturday, Jun 25 2022

I almost always function with what comes after the until/without as necessary condition and negate the other part. However sometimes it just makes more sense to do it the other way around. We want to remain flexible.

User Avatar
vbordign134
Friday, Jan 21 2022

https://classic.7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/comment/189304

User Avatar
vbordign134
Friday, Jan 21 2022

Both likely arguments. Do you focus on the structure? Breaking down the argument first—finding the conclusion and the premises?

User Avatar
vbordign134
Wednesday, Apr 20 2022

Check out their respective NALP reports! Plus, don’t have to write a Wisconsin Bar!!?

User Avatar
vbordign134
Thursday, Jan 19 2023

Flexibility is required on the lsat. If in conditional statements particular indicators are throwing you, simply put the conditional statement into a basic “if”, “then” form with the first half the if (sufficient) and the second half the “then (necessary)” and you can see usually see them more clearly

If the judges are independent, then there will be a good legal system

User Avatar
vbordign134
Thursday, Aug 18 2022

The number one way to weaken on the LSAT is by an alternate explanation answer choice, or so I’ve been told. Look for strong answers and as above shouldn’t have to make assumptions.

User Avatar
vbordign134
Friday, Dec 16 2022

You can do it! Are you drilling your weaknesses?

User Avatar
vbordign134
Friday, Oct 14 2022

Agree with above, don’t be incessant about it. Do try to comprehend what you read foremost. But there can be tricky trap answer choices and so sometimes, at least writing something down or trying to map it out can get you to the correct one!

User Avatar
vbordign134
Friday, May 13 2022

If you fail the sufficient, the rules falls away.

PrepTests ·
PT121.S1.Q26
User Avatar
vbordign134
Friday, Aug 12 2022

"required" is used in the past tense. I found that helpful.

User Avatar
vbordign134
Friday, Mar 11 2022

Hi there welcome! BR/review is of utmost importance so take your time.

User Avatar
vbordign134
Monday, Oct 10 2022

I understand. It sounds like you may be on the precipice of a breakthrough. Try focusing on the conclusion if nothing else, and ask " how can I argue against this". It is important to remember you do not have to prove the conclusion, but just weaken the support between the premise and conclusion, and typically an alternate explanation is the best answer choice here.

User Avatar
vbordign134
Friday, Dec 10 2021

@-roccccs as simple as that.

User Avatar
vbordign134
Wednesday, Jun 08 2022

Can’t join meeting!

User Avatar
vbordign134
Wednesday, Sep 07 2022

Agree with @ wholeheartedly. I struggled recognizing them also, but am much more familiar so it can be done. You could also search in discussion for comments on the topic.

User Avatar
vbordign134
Saturday, Aug 06 2022

Based on the facts (stimulus), what can be supported? The answer choice does not have to be strong nor a totality of the stimulus, but maybe just a small part. Perhaps pay attention to the first and last sentences (if more than two).

User Avatar
vbordign134
Monday, Jun 06 2022

J.Y. Also deciphers them on harder questions to get to the correct answer.

User Avatar
vbordign134
Wednesday, Feb 01 2023

If you’re just beginning your learning try not to torture yourself too much on mastering this yet perhaps. It will come. Do your best with something in your head and go to the answer choices and focus on the conclusion or to weaken anti conclusion

User Avatar
vbordign134
Wednesday, Feb 01 2023

It’s an lsat way of saying “at least as” and possibly greater

User Avatar
vbordign134
Wednesday, Feb 01 2023

I am thinking this lesson may be referring to negating or denying a conditional. Whereby the sufficient exists AND one instance of the necessary does not.

User Avatar
vbordign134
Wednesday, Feb 01 2023

What is the author fighting for? Dig deep on argument structure.

User Avatar
vbordign134
Wednesday, Feb 01 2023

Without seeing the prompt, Sounds like the purpose of getting this question is to recognize the sufficient necessary flaw here. Is there an answer choice that addresses that?

User Avatar
vbordign134
Wednesday, Feb 01 2023

Hi do you have any specific concerns or examples?

Confirm action

Are you sure?