Self-study
vivibee
- Joined
- Dec 2025
- Subscription
- Live
Admissions profile
LSAT
Not provided
Goal score: 175
CAS GPA
3.95
1L START YEAR
2027
Applications
Boston College
In process
Boston College
In process
Boston University
In process
Boston University
In process
Columbia
In process
Columbia
In process
Cornell
In process
Cornell
In process
Emory
In process
Emory
In process
Fordham
In process
Fordham
In process
Georgetown
In process
Georgetown
In process
Harvard
In process
Harvard
In process
Northeastern
In process
Northeastern
In process
Stanford
In process
Stanford
In process
UCLA
In process
UCLA
In process
UCONN
In process
UCONN
In process
UT Austin
In process
UT Austin
In process
Vanderbilt
In process
Vanderbilt
In process
Yale
In process
Yale
In process
Discussions
vivibee
Thursday, May 21
@vivibee oh i get it now. the second sentence is supposed to be referencing star identification? but how could I reasonably assume that when the first sentences main subject seems to be brown dwarfs because its only referencing stars as a point of comparison-- and the next sentence starts with "they?" they who? they as in the main subject of the previous sentence I just read? that makes much more sense than than the "they" being stars.
vivibee
Thursday, May 21
dang im looking in the comments and i feel like no one had the same problem as me. i read the second sentence, that brown dwarfs are identified as such with or without lithium in its atmosphere, goes against the absolute claim that C provides. Like, I took that to mean that something can be identified as a brown dwarf with or without lithium in its atmosphere. boo
good luck everyone!!!