User Avatar
vivibee
Joined
Dec 2025
Subscription
Live

Admissions profile

LSAT
173
CAS GPA
3.95
1L START YEAR
2027

Applications

Boston College
Intend to apply
Boston University
Intend to apply
Columbia
Intend to apply
Cornell
Intend to apply
Emory
Intend to apply
Fordham
Intend to apply
Georgetown
Intend to apply
Harvard
Intend to apply
Minnesota
Intend to apply
Northeastern
Intend to apply
Stanford
Intend to apply
UCLA
Intend to apply
UCONN
Intend to apply
UT Austin
Intend to apply
Vanderbilt
Intend to apply
Yale
Intend to apply

Discussions

User Avatar
vivibee
Thursday, Jun 4

good luck everyone!!!

3
PrepTests ·
PT117.S3.Q24
User Avatar
vivibee
Wednesday, Jun 3

@PowerUp_Tutoring yeah i see now i was entirely too tunnel visioned on this one

2
PrepTests ·
PT117.S3.Q24
User Avatar
vivibee
Thursday, May 21

@vivibee oh i get it now. the second sentence is supposed to be referencing star identification? but how could I reasonably assume that when the first sentences main subject seems to be brown dwarfs because its only referencing stars as a point of comparison-- and the next sentence starts with "they?" they who? they as in the main subject of the previous sentence I just read? that makes much more sense than than the "they" being stars.

2
PrepTests ·
PT117.S3.Q24
User Avatar
vivibee
Thursday, May 21

dang im looking in the comments and i feel like no one had the same problem as me. i read the second sentence, that brown dwarfs are identified as such with or without lithium in its atmosphere, goes against the absolute claim that C provides. Like, I took that to mean that something can be identified as a brown dwarf with or without lithium in its atmosphere. boo

1

Confirm action

Are you sure?