Subscription pricing
I'm taking the March LSAT this upcoming Saturday (3/30) but I'm nowhere near ready for the exam. I started studying in January and overestimated how much I could do while working FT and have only completed about 75% of the core curriculum and about 4-5 PTs (I started to try and do PTs since I was fast approaching the exam date).
I'm averaging about 159 on my exams and can get up to 166 on BR (mostly because I can do LGs perfectly untimed but during the timed section I get anywhere from -5 to most recently -9). I don't have enough time to improve my score but I figured since it's my first time taking the test, I should still go and do so. However, should I worry about getting a score that is not reflective of my true ability? I know you can omit the score but I don't know how much it matters since it's evident schools don't average anymore.
Help is appreciated! Thanks!
@ said:
I had LG-LR(25)-LR(26)-RC-LR(25).
LG had game on Quandryville and Pleasantville.
RC had Argentinian author, hominids, and comparative law on women's labor.
For LR:
First Q of my first LR (25) section was on restaurants long term versus new patrons and the menu.
For the 26 LR, first Q was on blood transfusions and hepatitis. There were also two sets of the one stimulus, two Q's.
For my last LR (25) the first Q was on the mayor's comment on wild, non domesticated animals and dogs. There was also a question about tutoring students and spelling ability for academic ability towards the end.
Sounds like I had the exact sections as you except my order was LR-LR-LG-LR-RC. Wondering which LR was experimental because thought the first one was easiest...