Yeah it will be Im sorry. You need to pay the LSAC people for the rights to use test material. Anything with real LSAT questions will be unavailable

Might just be looking too far into it, but I don't understand why the tiger example is a strong argument. Obviously, the statement is true that tigers are mammals; however, there is no evidence given that the tiger is a mammal. If someone didn't know a tiger was a mammal, this argument would be incredibly weak. Is that just looking way too far into the argument?