ditto ....ive had a very similar experience with both my june and dec takes as well and retaking feb....hv been suggested to try beta blockers as well...subliminal stress seems to make the test anxiety super bad....trying to completely detox body and mind next 41 days till the next take....thanks for sharing.....it feels crazy and odd coz as lawyers one is expected to cope with stressful situations....any difficult situation is ok if u ask me just dont give me a goddamn timed test... :)

thank u soo much!!

got stuck on this while doing PT 37 section 2 qs 3.....such an easy qs and easy to do....but for some reason i tried to map the embedded conditionals and got trapped akin to going down alice's hole....am getting stuck on every qs that has without in its sentence structures since....mental knot that refuses to dissolve....could you please help with reference to the embedded logic in this qs...

However it's not true that that's the case with all group3 translations. For example, "Ella can pass unless she gives her presentation" That translates to "If Ella can't pass then she will give her presentation" EP-->GP.> ....

did you mean this has to be /EP-->GP....typo?? confused....maybe its just my mental state about this whole thing....> > >

Hey Josh, were you still going to post a list of the qs that we went over in the workshops for us to be able to review and catch up on the workshops we missed out on....would be awesome if u would/could .....:)

b is stronger than e coz e addresses adequacy whereas b addresses survival....for sure as suggested in e grains might not be adequate nutrition but here i think the main point is consideration for quantity vs quality.....how many mouths can we feed vs how many mouths can we feed qualitatively- for it to be a moral dilemna....

"beef" up our agricultural sciences.....excuse the pun.....lol ...love ur wit JY!!

:)

awesome stuff!!! kudos to u Amy...!! just brilliant...

brilliant!! awesome thank uuu!!!

broke a sweat on this one....but awesome explanation cleared up the knot....

thanks heaps!!!

@danielmoshesieradzki129.Sieradzki Thanks for today!!! it was an awesome session....Would be super duper if u perhaps considered doing a bootcamp for those of us taking the Dec LSAT.... would do us a of much needed good....ur awesome btw :)

brilliant!! awesome thank uuu!!!

broke a sweat on this one....but awesome explanation cleared up the knot....

thanks heaps!!!

i reasoned the irrelevance of d eventually, but there is a subtle nuance there which might be good to pay heed to....the reference is to the popular use of the term 'fittest' vis a vie the biologist's interpretation of the term leading to the tautology....here the author uses the biologist version --> tautology ---> non informative and scientifically irrelevant....

doesn't necessarily lead us to say scientifically informative claims can not use terms the way they are used by the public just because not done so in this particular instance....

love u LSAT writers!!

u guys are super awesome.....

isn't it invention?? less creative effort in implementation of technology as compared with true invention.....i have read another reference online citing intervention....is there a typo in the qs on the link???

brilliant!!! just had an aha moment!! thank uuu!!

agree....but that is exactly what is going on in answer choice b too if we read closely.....few deny, one denies, but flaw in the method used hence rejected by author in favour of contrary view...the only difference between answer choices b and c being in c it is a universal quantifier with all ....

loving it!! feel so proud of my fellow aussie.....:) he is brilliant.....absolutely lovable

" the error of what the hell are you talking about!!..." lol.....absolutely brilliant JY!!

sometimes i laugh out loud while watching the videos with your comments....

huge grin!!

:)

wondered if the recording is up yet?

thanks guys!! helped a ton!! glad i asked... :smiley: