I am getting a 178 in February 2024 LSAT! A 178 is on its way to embrace me!

can something simultaneously be SA, NA, and strengthen？ the almost NA nature of D made me wanted to not choose D. #help

what is the conclusion trying to establish, that the result is good? (influenza decreased BECAUSE of the campaign) or campaign is worked (people did start to wash hands more)

admittedly I think A is also a bad strengthen because the causation between handwashing and campaign is arbitrary. would love more #help

same here, i thought AC A for 27 is mainly a conditional logic failure. the passage implied that a part of the brain is responsible for an activity due to oxygen differentials. but AC A is simply saying that the part is necessary, not sufficient

lmao i thought it meant "in winter you should fish the lake trout's prey near the surface so you invoke them to come out just like summer" so I chose AC D, this is so farfetched now that I look back at the stimulus. but also would never have known "eschew fish haunt" meant that

i keep on thinking about contract law for this question lmao... in scienter no knowledge of the fact does not necessarily equal to no intention to deceive ToT

I lowkey remembered there was another question that is like this and the answer choice for that one was B.... in that question there was also a conditional statement in the conclusion. SOMEONE HELPPP #help

For question 16, why couldn't it be D? Because it also said that people all have their different values when searching for that "objective truth", so wouldn't it be like one person having an apple while the other has an orange?

#help

Yes please!